Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):1977-1980.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007320.

The Stress Concentration and Biomechanical Properties of the Intra-oral Distractors and the Extra-oral Distractors Used in Treatment of Post Ankylosis Facial Asymmetric Patients: A Finite Element Analysis Study

Affiliations

The Stress Concentration and Biomechanical Properties of the Intra-oral Distractors and the Extra-oral Distractors Used in Treatment of Post Ankylosis Facial Asymmetric Patients: A Finite Element Analysis Study

Yasser Nabil Elhadidi et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

Assessment of stress and micromotions using finite element analysis along both the intraoral and the extraoral distractors devices used in the mandibular distraction of post temporomandibular joint ankylosis deformed mandible patients. The process of finite element analysis was carried out to assess distraction models. The first model was an extraoral mandibular distraction model and the second model was an intraoral mandibular distraction model. To analyze the stress state, 2 vertical loads were applied on the defective and normal side respectively by a 3D finite element ball model. The intraoral system observed lower stress (4.5 MPa) in the mandibular bone compared to the extra-oral system (11.5 MPa). The results revealed that the intraoral system observed higher stress on the distractor fixing points (392.21 MPa) compared to the extra-oral fixing points (12.62 MPa). The results revealed that the extra-oral system reflected higher displacement on the bone surrounding the screws of about 3720 μm compared to the intraoral system 1414.6 μm. Internal devices give better shielding to the bone and induce fewer stresses over the mandibular, so it is more advisable to be used. The external devices permit greater distraction length because the pins and the distractor main body are subjected to fewer stresses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Topazian RG. Etiology of ankylosis of tempromandibular joint: analysis of 44 cases. J Oral Surg 1964; 22:227–233.
    1. Troulis MJ, Padwa B, Kaban LB. Distraction osteogenesis: past, present and future. Facial Plast Surg 1998; 14:205–215.
    1. Douglas LR, Douglass JB, Smith PJ. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a patient with severe micrognathia secondary to TMJ ankylosis using a tooth and bone-anchored device: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58:1429–1433.
    1. Sun J, Jiao T, Tie Y, et al. Three dimensional finite element analysis of the application of attachment for obturator framework in unilateral maxillary defect. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35:695–699.
    1. Gao J, Xu W, Ding Z. 3D finite element mesh generation of complicated tooth model based on CT slices. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006; 28:916–924.

LinkOut - more resources