Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May:231:124-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

Immunity, immunotherapy, and rectal cancer: A clinical and translational science review

Affiliations
Review

Immunity, immunotherapy, and rectal cancer: A clinical and translational science review

Ebunoluwa E Otegbeye et al. Transl Res. 2021 May.

Abstract

Rectal cancer remains a challenging disease to treat. Therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), the most frequent presentation, has evolved to include a multimodal approach of radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. While this approach improves local disease control, the distant recurrence rate is nearly 30% and treatment-related morbidity is substantial, thus underscoring the need for new therapeutic approaches with better efficacy and lower side effects. Immunotherapy could potentially fill this need, but its promise is not yet realized in rectal cancer. In this translational science review, we address what is known about how cytotoxic therapies shape rectal cancer immunity and potentially prime the tumor microenvironment for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapies. We also address the role of current immunotherapies in colorectal cancer and highlight where novel immunotherapy approaches are currently being evaluated in LARC. Finally, we address important future directions in LARC immunotherapy including the need to define optimal therapeutic sequencing, predictive biomarkers, strategies to limit treatment-related side effects and the potential of gut microbiome manipulation to improve outcomes. In summary, this review provides a framework to guide future research and inform immunotherapy trial design so as to advance rectal cancer care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflict of Interest: Dr. Chaudhuri has the following potential conflicts of interest: AC is a scientific advisor/consultant for Roche Sequencing Solutions, Tempus Labs, and Geneoscopy; has done consulting work with Fenix Group International, and Guidepoint; has received speaker honoraria and travel support from Roche Sequencing Solutions and Foundation Medicine; receives research support from Roche Sequencing Solutions; and is an inventor of intellectual property licensed to Biocognitive Labs. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest related to the material presented herein, and all have read the journal’s policy on disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Impact of Radiation and Chemotherapy on the tumor microenvironment.
Illustration of how both modalities have the ability stimulate and/or suppress immunity as related to rectal cancer. 5-FU, F-fluorouracil; APC, antigen-presenting cell; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; DAMP, damage-associated molecular patterns; FOLFOX, 5-FU/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin; IDO1, indoleamine 2,3, dioxygenase 1; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; MHC-I, Major Histocompatabillity Complex I; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; NK, natural killer cells; PD-1, Programmed Death 1; PD-L1, Programmed Death Ligand 1; TAM, tumor-associated macrophages; TGF-β, tumor growth factor-beta; TLR, toll-like receptors; TME, Tumor Mircoenvironment; Tregs, regulatory T cell; Type I IFN, Type I Interferon
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Current and potential cellular targets for immunotherapy in rectal cancer.
CD40-L, CD40 Ligand; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4; HSV, herpes simplex virus; IDO1, indoleamine 2,3, dioxygenase 1; MHC-I, major histocompatibility complex I; PD-1, programmed death 1; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; TCR, T cell receptor; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70: 7–30. 2020/January/09. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal Cancer, Version 1.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alavi M, Wendel CS, Krouse RS, et al. Predictors of Bowel Function in Long-term Rectal Cancer Survivors with Anastomosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24: 3596–3603. 2017/August/09. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6017-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kupsch J, Jackisch T, Matzel KE, et al. Outcome of bowel function following anterior resection for rectal cancer-an analysis using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33: 787–798. 2018/March/16. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3006-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fernandez-Martos C, Garcia-Albeniz X, Pericay C, et al. Chemoradiation, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery: long-term results of the Spanish GCR-3 phase II randomized trialdagger. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1722–1728. 2015/May/10. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv223. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types