Effect of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity: a 3-arm randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 33307900
- PMCID: PMC8285039
- DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1856869
Effect of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity: a 3-arm randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Urban adolescents with asthma often have inadequate preventive care. We tested the effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity and preventive medication adherence.Methods:Subjects/Setting- 12-16yr olds with persistent asthma in Rochester, NY schools. Design- 3-group randomized trial (2014-2019). SB-ACT Intervention- Two core components: 1) Directly observed therapy (DOT) of preventive asthma medications, provided in school for at least 6-8 weeks for the teen to learn proper technique and experience the benefits of daily preventive therapy; 2) 4-6 weeks later, 3 sessions of motivational interviewing (MI) to discuss potential benefits from DOT and enhance motivation to take medication independently. We included 2 comparison groups: 1) DOT-only for 6-8wks, and 2) asthma education (AE) attention control. Masked follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 5, and 7mos. Outcomes- Mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs)/2 weeks and medication adherence. Analyses- Modified intention-to-treat repeated measures analysis.Results: We enrolled 430 teens (56% Black, 32% Hispanic, 85% Medicaid). There were no group differences at baseline. We found no difference in SFDs at any follow-up timepoint. More teens in the SB-ACT and DOT-only groups reported having a preventive asthma medication at each follow-up (p<.001), and almost daily adherence at 3 and 5-months (p<.001, p=.003) compared to AE. By 7 months there were no significant differences between groups in adherence (p=.49).Conclusion: SB-ACT improved preventive medication availability and short-term adherence but did not impact asthma symptoms. Further work is needed to create developmentally appropriate and effective interventions for this group.
Keywords: Adherence; adolescents; directly observed therapy; motivational interviewing; schools; symptoms; urban.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Interest Statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Figures
References
-
- Milligan KL, Matsui E, Sharma H. Asthma in Urban Children: Epidemiology, Environmental Risk Factors, and the Public Health Domain. Current allergy and asthma reports. 2016;16(4):33. - PubMed
-
- Asthma Disparities in America: A Roadmap to Reducing Burden on Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (2020) aafa.org/asthmadisparities, 2020.
-
- Moorman JE, Zahran H, Truman BI, Molla MT. Current asthma prevalence - United States, 2006–2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011;60 Suppl:84–86. - PubMed
-
- Wennergren G, Kristjansson S, Strannegard IL. Decrease in hospitalization for treatment of childhood asthma with increased use of antiinflammatory treatment, despite an increase in prevalence of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;97(3):742–748. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical