Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan:157:103186.
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103186. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

Bleeding with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: A network meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Bleeding with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: A network meta-analysis

Avash Das et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Targeted therapies like vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are the first-choice treatment in several types of cancers. We aim to determine the comparative risk of bleeding events associated with the VEGFR-TKIs through a network meta-analysis.

Methods: Published data search up to November 2018 reporting bleeding in cancer patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs was performed. The primary outcome was presence of hemorrhagic events at the end of the trial. Bleeding as a side-effect profile was examined for eleven VEGFR-TKIs (Apatinib, Brivanib, Cabozantinib, Lenvatinib, Motesanib, Nintedanib, Pazopanib, Regorafenib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib and Vandetanib). Network meta-analysis based on random effects model estimating Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI), compared the risk of bleeding events among the VEGFR-TKIs with respect to placebo control conditions.

Results: Fifty Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) including 16,753 cancer patients were included in this analysis. Twenty studies compared VEGFR-TKIs with placebo, the remaining studies compared VEGFR-TKIs with the standard chemotherapeutic regimen. VEGFR-TKIs were associated with increased incidence of all-grade hemorrhagic events in comparison to control (standard chemotherapy and/or placebo) (OR = 1.79; 95 % CI 1.50-2.13, p-value <0.0001) and placebo (OR = 1.50; 95 % CI 1.16-1.93, p-value = 0.1). However, there was no difference in high-grade bleeding in patients treated with VEGFR-TKI in comparison to control (OR = 1.22; 95 % CI 0.87-1.71, p-value 0.74) or placebo alone (OR = 1.05; 95 % CI 0.65-1.70, p-value 0.73). Among individual VEGFR-TKIs, Sunitinib (OR = 3.31, 95 % CI 2.34-4.69) and Regorafenib (OR = 2.92, 95 % CI 1.50-5.71) were associated with higher risk of hemorrhagic events in comparison to placebo.

Conclusion: VEGR-TKIs, particularly Sunitinib and Regorafenib appear to be associated with increased risk of bleeding incidence.

Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD42017056406.

Keywords: Bleeding; Clinical trials systematic review/network meta-analysis; VEGFR-TKIs.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources