Is great information good enough? Evidence from physicians as patients
- PMID: 33310197
- PMCID: PMC7855422
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102406
Is great information good enough? Evidence from physicians as patients
Abstract
We place an upper bound on the degree to which policies aimed at improving the information deficiencies of patients may lead to greater adherence to clinical guidelines and recommended practices. To do so, we compare the degree of adherence attained by a group of patients that should have the best possible information on health care practices-i.e., physicians as patients-with that attained by a comparable group of non-physician patients, taking various steps to account for unobservable differences between the two groups. Our results suggest that physicians, at best, do only slightly better in adhering to both low- and high-value care guidelines than non-physicians.
Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines; High-value health care; Information disclosure; Low value health care; Patient adherence.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Artmann Elisabeth, Oosterbeek Hessel, and van der Klaauw Bas. 2019. “Do doctors improve the health care of their parents? Evidence from admission lotteries,” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14061.
-
- Associated Press and NORC. 2017. Finding Quality Doctors: How Americans Evaluate Provider Quality in the United States, July 2017.
-
- Bronnenberg Bart J., Dube Jean-Pierre, Gentzkow Matthew, and Shapiro Jesse. 2015. “Do Pharmacists Buy Bayer? Informed Shoppers and the Brand Premium,” Quarterly Journal of Economics: 1669–1726.
-
- Brot-Goldberg Zarek C., Chandra Amitabh, Handel Benjamin R., and Kolstad Jonathan T.. 2017. “What does a Deductible Do? The Impact of Cost-Sharing on Health Care Prices, Quantities, and Spending Dynamics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(3): 1261–1318.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
