Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 28;26(44):7022-7035.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i44.7022.

Prognostic value of changes in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels for preoperative chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer

Affiliations

Prognostic value of changes in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels for preoperative chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer

Chinock Cheong et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, CRT alone cannot improve overall survival. Approximately 20% of patients with CRT-resistant tumors show disease progression. Therefore, predictive factors for treatment response are needed to identify patients who will benefit from CRT. We theorized that the prognosis may vary if patients are classified according to pre- to post-CRT changes in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels.

Aim: To identify patients with locally advanced rectal cancer for preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on carcinoembryonic antigen levels.

Methods: We retrospectively included locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent preoperative CRT and curative resection between 2011 and 2017. Patients were assigned to groups A, B, and C based on pre- and post-CRT serum CEA levels: Both > 5; pre > 5 and post ≤ 5; and both ≤ 5 ng/mL, respectively. We compared the response to CRT based on changes in serum CEA levels. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine optimal cutoff for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic factors for pathologic complete response (pCR)/good response.

Results: The cohort comprised 145 patients; of them, 27, 43, and 65 belonged to groups A, B, and C, respectively, according to changes in serum CEA levels before and after CRT. Pre- (P < 0.001) and post-CRT (P < 0.001) CEA levels and the ratio of down-staging (P = 0.013) were higher in Groups B and C than in Group A. The ratio of pathologic tumor regression grade 0/1 significantly differed among the groups (P = 0.003). Group C had the highest number of patients showing pCR (P < 0.001). Most patients with pCR showed pre- and post-CRT CEA levels < 5 ng/mL (P < 0.001, P = 0.008). Pre- and post-CRT CEA levels were important risk factors for pCR (OR = 18.71; 95%CI: 4.62-129.51, P < 0.001) and good response (OR = 5.07; 95%CI: 1.92-14.83, P = 0.002), respectively. Pre-CRT neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and post-CRT T ≥ 3 stage were also prognostic factors for pCR or good response.

Conclusion: Pre- and post-CRT CEA levels, as well as change in CEA levels, were prognostic markers for treatment response to CRT and may facilitate treatment individualization for rectal cancer.

Keywords: Carcinoembryonic antigen levels; Change in serum carcinoembryonic antigen; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy; Prognostic factor; Rectal cancer; Response of chemoradiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival in study groups according to pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen. A: Five-year disease-free survival in the groups according to pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (Group A vs Group B vs Group C; P = 0.145); and B: Five-year overall survival in the groups according to pre- and post-CRT serum CEA levels (Group A vs Group B vs Group C; P = 0.005). Group A: patients with pre- and post-CRT CEA levels > 5 ng/mL; Group B: Patients with pre- and post-CRT CEA levels > 5 and ≤ 5 ng/mL, respectively; and Group C: Patients with pre- and post-CRT CEA levels < 5 ng/mL.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative vs postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–1740. - PubMed
    1. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1114–1123. - PubMed
    1. Gérard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Chapet O, Closon-Dejardin MT, Untereiner M, Leduc B, Francois E, Maurel J, Seitz JF, Buecher B, Mackiewicz R, Ducreux M, Bedenne L. Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4620–4625. - PubMed
    1. Dayde D, Tanaka I, Jain R, Tai MC, Taguchi A. Predictive and Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collette L, Bosset JF, den Dulk M, Nguyen F, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Piérart M, Calais G European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group. Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4379–4386. - PubMed

Substances