Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec:1:100005.
doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2020.100005.

Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic: Protocol and results of first three weeks from an international cross-section survey - focus on health professionals

Shanaya Rathod  1   2 , Saseendran Pallikadavath  2 , Allan H Young  3 , Lizi Graves  1 , Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman  2 , Ashlea Brooks  1 , Mustafa Soomro  4 , Pranay Rathod  5 , Peter Phiri  1
Affiliations

Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic: Protocol and results of first three weeks from an international cross-section survey - focus on health professionals

Shanaya Rathod et al. J Affect Disord Rep. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The psychological impact of COVID-19, resultant measures and future consequences to life will be unveiled in time.

Aim: To investigate the psychological impact of COVID-19, resultant restrictions, impact on behaviours and mental wellbeing globally. This early analysis, explores positive and adverse factors and behaviours with focus on healthcare professionals.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey, using a questionnaire based on published approaches to understand the psychological impact of COVID-19. The survey will be repeated at 6 months because of rapidly changing situation.

Results: We have presented results from first 3 weeks of the survey. Conclusions may change as more individuals take part over time. 7,917 participants completed the survey in the first 3 weeks; 7,271 are from the United Kingdom. 49.7% of the participants are healthcare professionals. There is high representation of female participants. Participants reporting suicidal thoughts is 32%. Healthcare professionals have reported mild depression and anxiety in higher proportions. Increasing age and female gender report higher compliance with government advice on COVID 19 whereas higher education, homeowners, key worker status, high alcohol, drug use and participants with pre-existing suicidal thoughts reported low compliance with government advice. Participants who reported suicidal thoughts pre-COVID are less likely to communicate with friends and family, or engage in coping strategies.

Conclusions: Evidence has shown an adverse psychological impact of previous pandemics on the population, especially wellbeing of healthcare professionals. Research should focus on identifying the need, preparing services and determining the factors that enhance and build resilience.

Funding: This survey is linked to a MRC global health research program of the Portsmouth-Brawijaya center for Global Health, Population, and Policy, (MR/N006267/1), University of Portsmouth.

Keywords: Covid-19; Healthcare professionals; Psychological impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

    1. Bedford J., Enria D., Giesecke J., Ihekweazu C., Kobinger G. . COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1015–1018. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., Rubin G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395:912–920. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fancourt D., Bu F., Van Mak H., Steptoe A. University College; London: 2020. Covid 19 Social Study. Results Release 1. . https://746a1e8d-7231-4b96-9bc2-88b2eb5c4964.filesusr.com/ugd/3d9db5_a82.... (accessed 10June2020)
    1. Department of Health and Social Care . 2020. Coronavirus: Action plan. A guide to What You Can Expect Across the UK. . https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-action-plan. (accessed 09 June 2020)
    1. Hughes M.E., Waite L.J., Hawkley L.C., Cacioppo J.T. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res. Aging. 2004;26(6):655–672. - PMC - PubMed