Tuning and external validation of an adult congenital heart disease risk prediction model
- PMID: 33313813
- PMCID: PMC8728026
- DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa090
Tuning and external validation of an adult congenital heart disease risk prediction model
Abstract
Aims: Adequate risk prediction can optimize the clinical management in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). We aimed to update and subsequently validate a previously developed ACHD risk prediction model.
Methods and results: A prediction model was developed in a prospective cohort study including 602 moderately or severely complex ACHD patients, enrolled as outpatients at a tertiary centre in the Netherlands (2011-2013). Multivariable Cox regression was used to develop a model for predicting the 1-year risks of death, heart failure (HF), or arrhythmia (primary endpoint). The Boston ACHD Biobank study, a prospectively enrolled cohort (n = 749) of outpatients who visited a referral centre in Boston (2012-2017), was used for external validation. The primary endpoint occurred in 153 (26%) and 191 (28%) patients in the derivation and validation cohorts over median follow-up of 5.6 and 2.3 years, respectively. The final model included 5 out of 14 pre-specified predictors with the following hazard ratios; New York Heart Association class ≥II: 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.90], cardiac medication 2.52 (95% CI 1.72-3.69), ≥1 reintervention after initial repair: 1.56 (95% CI 1.09-2.22), body mass index: 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.07), log2 N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (pmol/L): 1.48 (95% CI 1.32-1.65). At external validation, the model showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.83) and excellent calibration (calibration-in-the-large = -0.002; calibration slope = 0.99).
Conclusion: These data support the validity and applicability of a parsimonious ACHD risk model based on five readily available clinical variables to accurately predict the 1-year risk of death, HF, or arrhythmia. This risk tool may help guide appropriate care for moderately or severely complex ACHD.
Keywords: Adult congenital heart disease; Biobank; Cohort study; External validation; NT-proBNP; Prediction model; Prognosis.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figures
References
-
- Tutarel O, Kempny A, Alonso-Gonzalez R, Jabbour R, Li W, Uebing A et al. Congenital heart disease beyond the age of 60: emergence of a new population with high resource utilization, high morbidity, and high mortality. Eur Heart J 2014;35:725–732. - PubMed
-
- Mackie AS, Tran DT, Marelli AJ, Kaul P. Cost of congenital heart disease hospitalizations in Canada: a population-based study. Can J Cardiol 2017;33:792–798. - PubMed
-
- Baumgartner H, Budts W, Chessa M, Deanfield J, Eicken A, Holm J et al.; for the Working Group on Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for organization of care for adults with congenital heart disease and for training in the subspecialty of ‘Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease’ in Europe: a position paper of the Working Group on Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2014;35:686–690. - PubMed
-
- Baggen VJM, Venema E, Zivna R, van den Bosch AE, Eindhoven JA, Witsenburg M et al. Development and validation of a risk prediction model in patients with adult congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2019;276:87–92. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
