Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 5;8(1):70-78.
doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa090.

Tuning and external validation of an adult congenital heart disease risk prediction model

Affiliations

Tuning and external validation of an adult congenital heart disease risk prediction model

Laurie W Geenen et al. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. .

Abstract

Aims: Adequate risk prediction can optimize the clinical management in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). We aimed to update and subsequently validate a previously developed ACHD risk prediction model.

Methods and results: A prediction model was developed in a prospective cohort study including 602 moderately or severely complex ACHD patients, enrolled as outpatients at a tertiary centre in the Netherlands (2011-2013). Multivariable Cox regression was used to develop a model for predicting the 1-year risks of death, heart failure (HF), or arrhythmia (primary endpoint). The Boston ACHD Biobank study, a prospectively enrolled cohort (n = 749) of outpatients who visited a referral centre in Boston (2012-2017), was used for external validation. The primary endpoint occurred in 153 (26%) and 191 (28%) patients in the derivation and validation cohorts over median follow-up of 5.6 and 2.3 years, respectively. The final model included 5 out of 14 pre-specified predictors with the following hazard ratios; New York Heart Association class ≥II: 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.90], cardiac medication 2.52 (95% CI 1.72-3.69), ≥1 reintervention after initial repair: 1.56 (95% CI 1.09-2.22), body mass index: 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.07), log2 N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (pmol/L): 1.48 (95% CI 1.32-1.65). At external validation, the model showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.83) and excellent calibration (calibration-in-the-large = -0.002; calibration slope = 0.99).

Conclusion: These data support the validity and applicability of a parsimonious ACHD risk model based on five readily available clinical variables to accurately predict the 1-year risk of death, HF, or arrhythmia. This risk tool may help guide appropriate care for moderately or severely complex ACHD.

Keywords: Adult congenital heart disease; Biobank; Cohort study; External validation; NT-proBNP; Prediction model; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic overview of the development and validation process of the ACHD risk prediction model. The ACHD risk prediction model provides estimates of the 1-year risk of death, heart failure, or arrhythmia for moderately and severely complex ACHD patients based on five clinical variables. Online web application of the prediction model is accessible at https://achdwebcalculator-updated.shinyapps.io/achdshinyweb/, or scan the QR code. ACHD, adult congenital heart disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calibration plot of the external validation of the prediction model by the plotted probabilities of the 1-year risk of death, heart failure, or arrhythmia. Diagonal line shows ideal calibration where predicted probability is equal to the observed probability.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Density plot showing the distribution of the 1-year predicted probabilities for the composite outcome of death, heart failure, or arrhythmia in the development cohort and validation cohort. Mean and median (25th–75th percentile) predicted probability for each cohort is given. The predicted probabilities of adverse outcome are higher in the validation cohort, which aligns with the higher observed probability.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative endpoint-free survival in 1289 adults with congenital heart disease according to sextile of the ACHD prediction model 1-year predicted risk of the composite endpoint. The endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure (associated with hospitalization or initiation/intensification of heart failure medication) or arrhythmia (symptomatic and recorded, or associated with treatment). ACHD, adult congenital heart disease.

References

    1. Tutarel O, Kempny A, Alonso-Gonzalez R, Jabbour R, Li W, Uebing A et al. Congenital heart disease beyond the age of 60: emergence of a new population with high resource utilization, high morbidity, and high mortality. Eur Heart J 2014;35:725–732. - PubMed
    1. Mackie AS, Tran DT, Marelli AJ, Kaul P. Cost of congenital heart disease hospitalizations in Canada: a population-based study. Can J Cardiol 2017;33:792–798. - PubMed
    1. Baumgartner H, Budts W, Chessa M, Deanfield J, Eicken A, Holm J et al.; for the Working Group on Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for organization of care for adults with congenital heart disease and for training in the subspecialty of ‘Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease’ in Europe: a position paper of the Working Group on Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2014;35:686–690. - PubMed
    1. Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, van der Windt DA, Hayden JA, Perel P, Schroter S et al.; for the PROGRESS Group. Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baggen VJM, Venema E, Zivna R, van den Bosch AE, Eindhoven JA, Witsenburg M et al. Development and validation of a risk prediction model in patients with adult congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2019;276:87–92. - PubMed

Publication types