Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):351-364.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4689.

Diagnosis of Progressive Multiple Sclerosis From the Imaging Perspective: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Diagnosis of Progressive Multiple Sclerosis From the Imaging Perspective: A Review

Massimo Filippi et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for monitoring disease dissemination in space and over time and excluding multiple sclerosis (MS) mimics, there has been less application of MRI to progressive MS, including diagnosing primary progressive (PP) MS and identifying patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS who are at risk of developing secondary progressive (SP) MS. This review addresses clinical application of MRI for both diagnosis and prognosis of progressive MS.

Observations: Although nonspecific, some spinal cord imaging features (diffuse abnormalities and lesions involving gray matter [GM] and ≥2 white matter columns) are typical of PPMS. In patients with PPMS and those with relapse-onset MS, location of lesions in critical central nervous system regions (spinal cord, infratentorial regions, and GM) and MRI-detected high inflammatory activity in the first years after diagnosis are risk factors for long-term disability and future progressive disease course. These measures are evaluable in clinical practice. In patients with established MS, GM involvement and neurodegeneration are associated with accelerated clinical worsening. Subpial demyelination and slowly expanding lesions are novel indicators of progressive MS.

Conclusions and relevance: Diagnosis of PPMS is more challenging than diagnosis of RRMS. No qualitative clinical, immunological, histopathological, or neuroimaging features differentiate PPMS and SPMS; both are characterized by imaging findings reflecting neurodegeneration and are also impacted by aging and comorbidities. Unmet diagnostic needs include identification of MRI markers capable of distinguishing PPMS from RRMS and predicting the evolution of RRMS to SPMS. Integration of multiple parameters will likely be essential to achieve these aims.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosures

Massimo Filippi is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology; received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and ARiSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA).

Paolo Preziosa received speakers honoraria from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck Serono and ExceMED.

Frederik Barkhof acts as a consultant to Biogen-Idec, Janssen, Bayer, Merck, Roche, Novartis, Genzyme, and Apitope Ltd; he has received sponsorship from EU-H2020, Nederlands Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, SMSR, EU-FP7, Teva, Novartis, and Biogen.

Declan Chard within the last 3 years has received honoraria from Excemed for faculty-led education work. He is a consultant for Biogen and Hoffmann-La Roche. He has received research funding from the International Progressive MS Alliance, the MS Society, and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre.

Nicola De Stefano has served as consultant for Immunic Therapeutics, Merck Serono SA, Novartis Pharma AG, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva, and has received support for congress participation or speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono SA, Novartis Pharma AG, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva.

Robert J. Fox declares personal consulting fees from Actelion, Biogen, Celgene, EMD Serono, Genentech, Immunic, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and TG Therapeutics; have served on clinical trial advisory committees for Actelion, Biogen, Immunic, and Novartis; and have received clinical trial contract and research grant funding from Biogen and Novartis.

Claudio Gasperini has received fees as invited speaker or travel expenses for attending meeting from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Teva, Sanofi, Novartis, Genzyme.

Ludwig Kappos’s institution (University Hospital Basel) has received the following support used exclusively for research support at the department: steering committee, advisory board and consultancy fees from Actelion, Alkermes, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/Receptos, df-mp, Excemed, GeNeuro SA, Genzyme, Japan Tobacco, Merck, Minoryx, Mitsubishi Pharma, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Santhera and Teva, as well as license fees for Neurostatus-UHB products; the Research of the MS Centre in Basel has been supported by grants from Bayer, Biogen, Novartis, the European Union, the Roche Research Foundations, the Swiss MS Society, Innoswiss and the Swiss National Research Foundation.

Xavier Montalban has received a speaker honorarium and travel expenses for participation in scientific meetings or advisory boards in past years from Actelion, Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Medday, Merck, Nervgen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, TG Therapeutics, Excemed, MSIF, and NMSS.

Bastiaan Moraal has nothing to disclose.

Daniel S. Reich has received unrelated research funding from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. He is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, USA.

Àlex Rovira has received a speaker honorarium from Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bracco, Merck-Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Novartis, Roche, and Biogen. He serves on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, SyntheticMR, Bayer, Roche, Biogen, Neurodiem, and OLEA Medical.

Ahmed T. Toosy has received speaker honoraria from Biomedia, Sereno Symposia International Foundation, Bayer and meeting expenses from Biogen Idec and is the UK PI for two clinical trials sponsored by MEDDAY pharmaceutical company (MD1003 in optic neuropathy [MS-ON] and progressive MS [MS-SPI2]).

Anthony Traboulsee has research funding from Chugai, Roche, Novartis, Genzyme, Biogen as well as consultancy honoraria from Genzyme, Roche, Teva, Biogen, Serono.

Brian G. Weinshenker reports personal fees from Novartis, MedImmune, Alexion, Chugai, Roche and Mitsubishi-Tanabe has a patent of NMO-IgG for diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica with royalties paid to RSR Ltd, Oxford University, Hospices Civil de Lyon, and MVZ Labor PD Dr Volkmann und Kollegen GbR.

Burcu Zeydan has nothing to disclose. She reports funding from the National Institutes of Health.

Brenda Banwell serves as a centralized MRI reviewer for Novartis, and serves as an unpaid advisor regarding pediatric MS clinical trial design for Novartis, Biogen Idec, and Teva Neuroscience.

Maria A. Rocca received speakers honoraria from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Genzyme, Teva, Merck Serono, Roche, Celgene and Bayer and receives research support from the Italian Ministry of Health, MS Society of Canada and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Summary of the MRI features supporting PPMS and SPMS diagnosis.
Features supporting diagnosis for both PPMS and SPMS include: A) PSIR axial sequence of the spinal cord (SC) (top and middle rows), lesions involving the GM and ≥2 WM columns on axial plane. No lesions detected in a RRMS female patient with 4 years of disease duration (left), whereas a lesion affecting the right anterior and posterior column, the left posterior column and the central GM is visible at C3-C4 level in a SPMS female patient with a disease duration of 22 years (right). A schematic representation of spinal cord subdivisions of GM and WM columns is shown in the bottom row. B) atrophy of the lower portion of the cervical SC. On the right, a sagittal 3D T1-weighted sequence reveals atrophy of the lower portion of the cervical SC (C7) (cord surface in blue) in a SPMS male patient with disease duration of 26 years. On the left, a sagittal 3D T1-weighted sequence (cord surface in green) of a RRMS male patient with disease duration of 6 years is shown. SC atrophy was quantified using the cord finder toolbox (Jim 7.0). C) Diffuse signal abnormalities in the SC (orange arrowheads) on a T2-weighted sequence in a patient with PPMS. D) GM atrophy of the SC in SPMS.. Compared to a RRMS female patient with a disease duration of 7 years (left), greater SC GM atrophy at C3/C4 level is visible on PSIR sequence in a SPMS patient with a disease duration of 19 years (right) using a local thresholding segmentation technique (Jim 7.0). Abbreviations: ant=anterior column; GM=gray matter; L=left; mm=millimeter; MS=multiple sclerosis; post=posterior column; PP=primary progressive; PSIR=phase-sensitive inversion recovery; R=right; RR=relapsing-remitting; SC=spinal cord; SP=secondary progressive; WM=white matter.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Summary of MRI predictors of subsequent disability progression and evolution to SPMS at disease onset.
In PPMS early predictors are A) gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing (orange arrowheads) on post-contrast T1-weighted sequences and B) spinal cord (SC) lesions at baseline (orange arrowheads), STIR sequence. In SPMS early predictors are C) the number and volume of baseline brain lesions (T2-FLAIR sequences); D) increase of brain lesion volume (LV) during the first 5 years (orange arrowheads) (T2-FLAIR sequences); E) ≥2 Gd-enhancing lesions at baseline (orange arrowheads) (post-contrast T1-weighted sequence); F) ≥1 SC lesion at baseline or ≥1 SC lesion within 1–3 years (orange arrowheads) (STIR sequence); G)≥1 infratentorial lesion at baseline or ≥1 infratentorial lesion within 1–3 years (orange arrowheads) (T2-FLAIR sequence); H) ≥1 cortical lesion at baseline (orange arrowheads) (DIR sequence); I) ≥1 new deep WM lesion within 1 year (orange arrowheads) (T2-FLAIR sequence). Relevant OR, HRs or global T2 LV that are associated with disability progression and evolution to SPMS at disease onset and that were derived from the literature and discussed in the text are also reported. Abbreviations: cm=centimeter; DIR=double inversion recovery; FLAIR=fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; Gd=gadolinium; HR=hazard ratio; LV=lesion volume; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; MS=multiple sclerosis; OR=odds ratio; PP=primary progressive; SC=spinal cord; SP=secondary progressive; STIR=short tau inversion recovery; WM=white matter.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Summary of the MRI markers to identify disability progression and SPMS evolution during the disease course.
In both PPMS and SPMS MRI markers are A) increase of number or volume of brain T1-hypointense lesions. Baseline and 1-year follow-up T1-weighted sequences of a PPMS patient. At follow-up, three new T1-hypointense lesions are visible (orange arrowheads); B) cortical lesion number and volume. A DIR sequence showing three cortical lesions (orange arrowheads) from a PPMS patient is shown; C) baseline thalamic (blue) and cortical (green) damage and atrophy. Quantification on MT imaging (left) and 3D T1-weighted sequences (right); D) rate of whole brain, brain GM (green) and deep GM (blue) atrophy. Quantification on a 3D T1-weighted sequence using SIENA and FIRST software. In SPMS also E) brain T2-hyperintense lesion volume (LV) (T2-FLAIR sequence) and F) conversion of DAWM (orange arrowheads and dotted orange areas) into focal WM lesions (T2-FLAIR sequence). Further promising MRI markers are G) the presence of ≥4 rim positive lesions on susceptibility-based MRI (orange arrowheads) and H) presence of subpial demyelination (orange arrowheads) on T2* sequence at ultra-high field (i.e., 7 Tesla). Figure 3H is adapted from Kilsdonk et al. with permission. Relevant OR, HRs or global T2 LV that were suggested to identify disability progression and SPMS evolution during the disease course and that were derived from the literature and discussed in the text are also reported. Abbreviations: cm=centimeter; DAWM=dirty-appearing white matter; DIR=double inversion recovery; FLAIR=fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; GM=gray matter; LV=lesion volume; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; MS=multiple sclerosis; MT=magnetization transfer; MTR=magnetization transfer ratio; OR=odds ratio; PP=primary progressive; SP=secondary progressive; y=year; WM=white matter.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–173. - PubMed
    1. Faissner S, Plemel JR, Gold R, Yong VW. Progressive multiple sclerosis: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019. - PubMed
    1. Kalincik T, Cutter G, Spelman T, et al. Defining reliable disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 11):3287–3298. - PubMed
    1. Lorscheider J, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V, et al. Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 9):2395–2405. - PubMed
    1. Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology. 2014;83(3):278–286. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms