Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 16;4(6):660-666.
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12386. eCollection 2020 Nov.

An ascites grading system for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer with peritoneum dissemination

Affiliations

An ascites grading system for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer with peritoneum dissemination

Michitaka Honda et al. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. .

Abstract

Aim: Gastric cancer with peritoneum dissemination is intractable with surgical resection. The evaluation of the degree of dissemination using computed tomography (CT) is difficult. We focused on the amount of ascites based on CT findings and established a scaling system to predict these patients' prognoses.

Methods: We extracted individual data from a population-based cohort. Patients diagnosed with histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneum dissemination were enrolled. Two raters evaluated the CT images and determined the grade of ascites in each patient: grade 0 indicated no ascites in all slices; grade 1 indicated ascites detected only in the upper or lower abdominal cavity; grade 2 indicated ascites detected in both the upper and lower abdominal cavities; and grade 3 indicated ascites extending continuously from the pelvic cavity to the upper abdominal cavity. We evaluated the relationship between the ascites grade and survival time. After adjusting for other clinical factors, we calculated hazard ratios of each ascites grade.

Results: A total of 718 patients were enrolled. The number of patients with grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 303, 223, 94, and 98, respectively. The median overall survival times were 16.0, 8.7, 5.4, and 3.0 months for ascites on CT grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < .001). The adjusted hazard ratios for the survival time were 1.74 (1.33-2.26, P < .001), 3.20 (2.25-4.57, P < .001), and 4.76 (3.16-7.17, P < .001) for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusion: We established a new grading system of pretreatment ascites to better predict the prognosis of gastric cancer.

Keywords: ascites; gastric cancer; peritoneal dissemination; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients’ enrollment. All of 718 patients were extracted from the population‐based cohort of stage IV gastric cancer
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curve of each ascites grade. Overall survival curves using for each AC grade using Kaplan‐Meier's methods

References

    1. Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, Miyashiro I, Katai H, Kodera Y, et al. Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(1):1–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Isobe Y, Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Oda I, Hayashi K, Miyashiro I, et al. Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(4):301–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Chen X, Nie R, Ou Yang L, Liu A, Li Y, et al. A nomogram to predict prognosis for gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30(4):449–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yajima K, Kanda T, Ohashi M, Wakai T, Nakagawa S, Sasamoto R, et al. Clinical and diagnostic significance of preoperative computed tomography findings of ascites in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2006;192(2):185–90. - PubMed
    1. Kim SJ, Kim H‐H, Kim YH, Hwang SH, Lee HS, Park DJ, et al. Peritoneal metastasis: detection with 16‐ or 64‐detector row CT in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Radiology. 2009;253(2):407–15. - PubMed