The Latin American network for congenital malformation surveillance: ReLAMC
- PMID: 33319501
- DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31872
The Latin American network for congenital malformation surveillance: ReLAMC
Abstract
The early detection of congenital anomaly epidemics occurs when comparing current with previous frequencies in the same population. The success of epidemiologic surveillance depends on numerous factors, including the accuracy of the rates available in the base period, wide population coverage, and short periodicity of analysis. This study aims to describe the Latin American network of congenital malformation surveillance: ReLAMC, created to increase epidemiologic surveillance in Latin America. We describe the main steps, tasks, strategies used, and preliminary results. From 2017 to 2019, five national registries (Argentina [RENAC], Brazil [SINASC/SIM-BRS], Chile [RENACH], Costa Rica [CREC], Paraguay [RENADECOPY-PNPDC]), six regional registries (Bogotá [PVSDC-Bogota], Cali [PVSDC-Cali], Maule [RRMC SSM], Nicaragua [SVDC], Nuevo-León [ReDeCon HU], São Paulo [SINASC/SIM-MSP]) and the ECLAMC hospital network sent data to ReLAMC on a total population of 9,152,674 births, with a total of 101,749 malformed newborns (1.1%; 95% CI 1.10-1.12). Of the 9,000,651 births in countries covering both live and stillbirths, 88,881 were stillborn (0.99%; 95% CI 0.98-0.99), and among stillborns, 6,755 were malformed (7.61%; 95% CI 7.44-7.79). The microcephaly rate was 2.45 per 10,000 births (95% CI 2.35-2.55), hydrocephaly 3.03 (2.92-3.14), spina bifida 2.89 (2.78-3.00), congenital heart defects 15.53 (15.27-15.79), cleft lip 2.02 (1.93-2.11), cleft palate and lip 2.77 (2.66-2.88), talipes 2.56 (2.46-2.67), conjoined twins 0.16 (0.14-0.19), and Down syndrome 5.33 (5.18-5.48). Each congenital anomaly showed heterogeneity in prevalence rates among registries. The harmonization of data in relation to operational differences between registries is the next step in developing the common ReLAMC database.
Keywords: Down syndrome; Latin America; congenital anomaly; microcephaly; stillbirths; surveillance.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alvarado, M. G., & Schwartz, D. A. (2017). Zika virus infection in pregnancy, microcephaly, and maternal and fetal health: What we think, what we know, and what we think we know. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 141, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0382-RA
-
- Andrews, K., Bourroul, M. L. M., Fink, G., Grisi, S., Scoleze Ferrer, A. P., Diniz, E. M. d. A., & Brentani, A. (2017). Time to change focus? Transitioning from higher neonatal to higher stillbirth mortality in São Paulo state, Brazil. PLOS ONE, 12, e0190060. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190060
-
- Antonarakis, S. E., Skotko, B. G., Rafii, M. S., Strydom, A., Pape, S. E., Bianchi, D. W., … Reeves, R. H. (2020). Down syndrome. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0143-7
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Perinatal deaths in Australia 2013-2014 Cat. no. PER 94. Canberra: AIHW. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/78784f2e-2f61-47ea-9908-84b34441ae0a/ai...
-
- Benavides-Lara, A., Faerron Ángel, J. E., Solís, L. U., José, J., & Zúñiga, R. (2011). Epidemiología y registro de las cardiopatías congénitas en Costa Rica. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 30, 31-38. Retrieved from. https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22159648
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
