Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;48(2):e31-e35.
doi: 10.1002/mp.14656. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

PET/CT acceptance testing and quality assurance: Executive summary of AAPM Task Group 126 Report

Benjamin P Lopez  1   2 , David W Jordan  3 , Brad J Kemp  4 , Paul E Kinahan  5 , Charles R Schmidtlein  6 , Osama R Mawlawi  1
Affiliations

PET/CT acceptance testing and quality assurance: Executive summary of AAPM Task Group 126 Report

Benjamin P Lopez et al. Med Phys. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: A Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography quality assurance program is necessary to ensure that patients receive optimal imaging and care. We summarize the AAPM Task Group (TG) 126 report on acceptance and quality assurance (QA) testing of PET/CT systems.

Methods: TG 126 was charged with developing PET/CT acceptance testing and QA procedures. The TG aimed to develop procedures that would allow for standardized evaluation of existing short-axis cylindrical-bore PET/CT systems in the spirit of NEMA NU 2 standards without requiring specialized phantoms or proprietary software tools.

Results: We outline eight performance evaluations using common phantoms and freely available software whereby the clinical physicist monitors each PET/CT system by comparing periodic Follow-Up Measurements to Baseline Measurements acquired during acceptance testing. For each of the eight evaluations, we also summarize the expected testing time and materials necessary and the recommended pass/fail criteria.

Conclusion: Our report provides a guideline for periodic evaluations of most clinical PET/CT systems that simplifies procedures and requirements outlined by other agencies and will facilitate performance comparisons across vendors, models, and institutions.

Keywords: PET; PET/CT; acceptance testing; quality assurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Mawlawi OR, Jordan DW, Halama JR, Schmidtlein CR, Wooten WW. PET/CT Acceptance Testing and Quality Assurance: The Report of AAPM Task Group 126, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/detail.asp?docid=193
    1. Karp JS, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Hoffman EJ, et al. Performance standards in positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:2342-2350.
    1. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC Standard 61675-1: Radionuclide Imaging Devices - Characteristics and Test Conditions - Part 1: Positron Emission Tomographs; 1998.
    1. International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Health Human Series No. 1: Quality Assurance for PET and PET/CT Systems. Vienna, Austria; 2009.
    1. International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Health Human Series No. 27: PET/CT Atlas on Quality Control and Image Artefacts, Vienna, Austria; 2014.