Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 13;13(24):5692.
doi: 10.3390/ma13245692.

Laser Fabrication of Anti-Icing Surfaces: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Laser Fabrication of Anti-Icing Surfaces: A Review

Annalisa Volpe et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

In numerous fields such as aerospace, the environment, and energy supply, ice generation and accretion represent a severe issue. For this reason, numerous methods have been developed for ice formation to be delayed and/or to inhibit ice adhesion to the substrates. Among them, laser micro/nanostructuring of surfaces aiming to obtain superhydrophobic behavior has been taken as a starting point for engineering substrates with anti-icing properties. In this review article, the key concept of surface wettability and its relationship with anti-icing is discussed. Furthermore, a comprehensive overview of the laser strategies to obtain superhydrophobic surfaces with anti-icing behavior is provided, from direct laser writing (DLW) to laser-induced periodic surface structuring (LIPSS), and direct laser interference patterning (DLIP). Micro-/nano-texturing of several materials is reviewed, from aluminum alloys to polymeric substrates.

Keywords: DLIP; LIPSS; anti-icing; direct laser writing; laser; metals; microstructuring; polymers; superhydrophobicity; wettability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The statistics of the published articles indexed in Scopus (black line) and of the published patents listed in Espacenet [15] (black dotted line) on the topic of “anti-icing”. Year range selected: 1988–2019.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Contact angle of a liquid lying on a surface and balance between surface tensions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic of droplet in (a) Wenzel state and (b) Cassie and Baxter state.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic of advancing and receding angles of a droplet sliding on a surface. Contact angle hysteresis is defined as the difference between these two.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic of a typical experimental setup for water dripping tests.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Schematic of the most common experimental methods for evaluating ice adhesion. (a) Peak force method. (b) Centrifugal force method. (c) Tensile force method. (Reprinted from [79], with permission from Elsevier). (d) Lateral view of the clamped ice-aluminum beam employed in the dynamic vibration test [80].
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) SEM image of the laser processed surface by parallel scanning lines. Highlighted in red is an enlarged image of the cauliflower-like protrusions spread on the micro-gratings. (b) Delay times as a function of the pitch distance h (Adapted from [65], with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Scanning electron microscope images of the stainless steel laser textured samples. Groove pitches: 80, 140, and 240 μm. In the insets, magnifications of the redeposited aggregates. (b) Evolution of the droplet set on the original and laser-machined superhydrophobic surfaces at subzero temperature (−8.5 ± 0.5 °C) (Reprinted with permission from [109]).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Snapshots of water accumulation (a) on the pristine surface compared with (b) the laser-treated Al2024 one at −20 °C. (Reproduced from [111] under the Creative Commons Attribution License).
Figure 10
Figure 10
(a) Morphology of samples irradiated with laser fluences of 10 J cm−2. (b) Freezing of the water droplet set on the superhydrophobic silicone rubber surface (laser fluences 12.5 J cm−2). In the red circle a bubble squeezed into the water droplet during the process is highlithed, Adapted from [115] (© IOP Publishing. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved).
Figure 11
Figure 11
SEM image of laser fabricated hierarchical structures: matrix micropattern with a pitch distance of 50 μm covered by LIPSS (Reprinted from [120], with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 12
Figure 12
(a) Hierarchical microstructures, via DLW and DLIP techniques on pure aluminum. (b) Comparison between the contact angle of untreated reference, DLW, DLIP, and DLW + DLIP textured samples. The inserted images represent the droplets providing the measured angles depending on the temperature. (c) Average freezing time on an untreated reference, DLW, DLIP, and DLW + DLIP structures at −20 °C. The experiments were performed using 8 µL of deionized water (From [124] under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Figure 13
Figure 13
Side view SEM image of two laser textured surfaces with a spatial period (a) bigger than and (b) comparable to a water droplet of 20 µm. (Reproduced from [124] under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

    1. Frankenstein S., Tuthill A.M. Ice adhesion to locks and dams: Past work; future directions? J. Cold Reg. Eng. 2002;16:83–96. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2002)16:2(83). - DOI
    1. Fillion R.M., Riahi A.R., Edrisy A. A review of icing prevention in photovoltaic devices by surface engineering. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014;32:797–809. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.015. - DOI
    1. Parent O., Ilinca A. Anti-icing and de-icing techniques for wind turbines: Critical review. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2011;65:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.01.005. - DOI
    1. Lynch F.T., Khodadoust A. Effects of ice accretions on aircraft aerodynamics. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2001;37:669–767. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00018-5. - DOI
    1. Vercillo V., Karpen N., Laroche A., Mayén Guillén J.A., Tonnicchia S., de Andrade Jorge R., Bonaccurso E. Analysis and modelling of icing of air intake protection grids of aircraft engines. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2019;160:265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.01.012. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources