Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 11;12(12):3730.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12123730.

CA125 and Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Affiliations
Review

CA125 and Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Parsa Charkhchi et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the second most lethal gynecological malignancy. The tumour biomarker CA125 has been used as the primary ovarian cancer marker for the past four decades. The focus on diagnosing ovarian cancer in stages I and II using CA125 as a diagnostic biomarker has not improved patients' survival. Therefore, screening average-risk asymptomatic women with CA125 is not recommended by any professional society. The dualistic model of ovarian cancer carcinogenesis suggests that type II tumours are responsible for the majority of ovarian cancer mortality. However, type II tumours are rarely diagnosed in stages I and II. The recent shift of focus to the diagnosis of low volume type II ovarian cancer in its early stages of evolution provides a new and valuable target for screening. Type II ovarian cancers are usually diagnosed in advanced stages and have significantly higher CA125 levels than type I tumours. The detection of low volume type II carcinomas in stage IIIa/b is associated with a higher likelihood for optimal cytoreduction, the most robust prognostic indicator for ovarian cancer patients. The diagnosis of type II ovarian cancer in the early substages of stage III with CA125 may be possible using a higher cutoff point rather than the traditionally used 35 U/mL through the use of point-of-care CA125 assays in primary care facilities. Rapid point-of-care testing also has the potential for effective longitudinal screening and quick monitoring of ovarian cancer patients during and after treatment. This review covers the role of CA125 in the diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer and explores novel and more effective screening strategies with CA125.

Keywords: CA125; ovarian cancer; point-of-care; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of MUC16(CA125) structure and its role in ovarian cancer. MUC16 has cytoplasmic, transmembrane, and extracellular components that harbour variable O- and N-glycosylation sites. The peptide component of MUC16 has approximately 22,152 amino acids. The N-terminal domain of MUC16 has 12,000 amino acids and exclusively harbours O-glycosylation. A considerable portion of its peptide component is composed of the tandem repeat region with 60+ repeats of 156 amino acids. MUC16 harbours about 56 sea-urchin, enterokinase, and agrin (SEA) domains. SEA domain is a shared feature among mucins, this domain is involved in cleavage and association of MUC16 subunits. The transmembrane domain is followed by a 32 amino acids cytoplasmic tail with possible phosphorylation sites. MUC16 is cleaved from an extracellular site with approximately 12 amino acids from the plasma membrane. The cleavage product is a 17 kDa molecule that harbours the repetitive CA125 epitope throughout its tandem repeat domains.
Figure 2
Figure 2
5-year survival in stage IIIa/b and IIIc patients with optimal and suboptimal resection at primary cytoreductive surgery [26,174].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Point-of-care biomarker analyzer for primary care facilities.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Colombet M., Soerjomataram I., Mathers C., Parkin D.M., Piñeros M., Znaor A., Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int. J. Cancer. 2019;144:1941–1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeppernick F., Meinhold-Heerlein I., Meinhold-Heerlein Á.I. The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Arch. Gynecol Obs. 2014;290:839–842. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3364-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schiavone M.B., Herzog T.J., Lewin S.N., Deutsch I., Sun X., Burke W.M., Wright J.D. Natural history and outcome of mucinous carcinoma of the ovary. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;205:480.e1–480.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M., Miller D., Brest A., Yu M., Ruhl J., Tatalovich Z., Mariotto A., Lewis D.R., et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2017. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2020.
    1. Hennessy B.T., Coleman R.L., Markman M. Ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2009;374:1371–1382. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61338-6. - DOI - PubMed