Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 1;3(1):16-22.
doi: 10.29045/14784726.2018.06.3.1.16.

Visual estimation of blood loss by UK pre-hospital clinicians: an observational study

Affiliations

Visual estimation of blood loss by UK pre-hospital clinicians: an observational study

Michael Liam Townend et al. Br Paramed J. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the accuracy of visual estimation of external blood loss by UK pre-hospital clinicians and to comment on its value during handover.

Methods: A sample of 104 pre-hospital clinicians were shown eight staged scenarios showing varying amounts of blood loss and asked to estimate the amount of blood loss depicted. Participants included a range of pre-hospital clinicians from both NHS ambulance trusts and Helicopter Emergency Medical Services.

Results: A wide distribution of estimates and therefore percentage error was observed in our study. Pre-hospital clinicians are inaccurate when estimating external blood loss at scene, regardless of training and skill level.

Conclusion: Visual estimation of blood loss is too inaccurate to be considered clinically worthwhile. Greater research focus is needed to investigate and validate better measures of blood loss that can be utilised in the pre-hospital and emergency medicine environment. Until evidence-based methods of estimation can be implemented, this information should not be included in hospital handovers.

Keywords: continuity of patient care; emergency medical services; haemorrhage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

None
Figure 1. Example stills from the scenarios.
None
Figure 2. Distribution of estimates by scenario.

References

    1. American College of Surgeons Trauma Committee. (2008). Advanced trauma life support for doctors (8th ed.). Chicago, IL: Author.
    1. Barnard E., Yates D., Edwards A. & Fragoso-Iniguez M. (2017). Epidemiology and aetiology of traumatic cardiac arrest in England and Wales: A retrospective database analysis. Resuscitation, 110, 90–94. - PubMed
    1. Beer H. L., Duvvi S., Webb C. J. & Tandon S. (2005). Blood loss estimation in epistaxis. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 119, 16–18. - PubMed
    1. Bose P., Regan F. & Paterson-Brown S. (2006). Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 919–924. - PubMed
    1. Brown S. N., Kumar D., Millins M. & Mark J. (Eds.). (2016). UK ambulance services: Clinical practice guidelines 2016. Bridgwater, England: Class Professional Publishing.

LinkOut - more resources