This is a preprint.
SCENTinel 1.0 : development of a rapid test to screen for smell loss
- PMID: 33330892
- PMCID: PMC7743103
- DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.10.20244301
SCENTinel 1.0 : development of a rapid test to screen for smell loss
Update in
-
SCENTinel 1.0: Development of a Rapid Test to Screen for Smell Loss.Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46:bjab012. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab012. Chem Senses. 2021. PMID: 33773496 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Commercially available smell tests are primarily used in research or in-depth clinical evaluations, but are too costly and lengthy for population surveillance in health emergencies like COVID-19. We developed the SCENTinel 1 . 0 test which rapidly evaluates three olfactory functions (detection, intensity, and identification). We tested whether self-administering the SCENTinel 1 . 0 test discriminates between individuals with smell loss or average smell ability (normosmics), and provides comparable performance as the validated and standardized NIH Toolbox ® Odor Identification Test in normosmics.
Methods: Using Bayesian linear models and prognostic classification algorithms, we compared the SCENTinel 1 . 0 performance of a group of self-reported anosmics (N=111, 47±13yo, F=71%,) and normosmics (N=154, 47±14yo, F=74%), as well as individuals reporting other smell disorders (e.g., hyposmia, parosmia; N=42, 55±10yo, F=67%).
Results: Ninety-four percent of normosmics met our SCENTinel 1 . 0 accuracy criteria, while only 10% of anosmics and 64% of individuals with other smell disorders did. Overall performance on SCENTinel 1 . 0 predicted belonging to the normosmic group better than identification or detection alone (vs. anosmic: AUC=0.95, Sensitivity=0.72, Specificity=0.94). Odor intensity provided the best single-feature predictor to classify normosmics. Among normosmics, 92% met the accuracy criteria at both SCENTinel 1 . 0 and the NIH Toolbox ® Odor Identification Test.
Conclusions: SCENTinel 1 . 0 is a practical test able to discriminate individuals with smell loss and is likely to be useful in many clinical situations, including COVID-19 symptom screening.
Similar articles
-
SCENTinel 1.0: Development of a Rapid Test to Screen for Smell Loss.Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46:bjab012. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab012. Chem Senses. 2021. PMID: 33773496 Free PMC article.
-
Proof-of-concept: SCENTinel 1.1 rapidly discriminates COVID-19 related olfactory disorders.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Nov 8:2022.03.23.22272807. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.23.22272807. medRxiv. 2022. Update in: Chem Senses. 2023 Jan 1;48:bjad002. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjad002. PMID: 35350197 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Proof-of-concept: SCENTinel 1.1 rapidly discriminates COVID-19-related olfactory disorders.Chem Senses. 2023 Jan 1;48:bjad002. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjad002. Chem Senses. 2023. PMID: 36796784 Free PMC article.
-
Correspondence between three olfactory tests and suprathreshold odor intensity ratings.Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Nov;124(9):1072-7. doi: 10.1080/00016480410015776. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004. PMID: 15513552
-
Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics.Chem Senses. 1998 Feb;23(1):71-82. doi: 10.1093/chemse/23.1.71. Chem Senses. 1998. PMID: 9530972 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Structural and metabolic brain abnormalities in COVID-19 patients with sudden loss of smell.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jun;48(6):1890-1901. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05154-6. Epub 2021 Jan 4. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33398411 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous