Fetal therapy: ethical and legal implications of prenatal intervention and clinical application
- PMID: 3333211
- DOI: 10.1159/000263279
Fetal therapy: ethical and legal implications of prenatal intervention and clinical application
Abstract
Recent advances in antenatal diagnosis have stimulated interest in the development of techniques for in utero treatment of fetal abnormalities. This article identifies and discusses the ethical and legal problems which emerge from fetal therapy. Is a fetus a patient? Does the fetus have rights? Who should give consent for the unborn? Does the fetus have redress if it is injured? Could a pregnant woman be forced to undergo treatment which could endanger her life and health for the benefit of the fetus? Answers to these questions are not clear and create in themselves additional queries. Until fetal therapy becomes an accepted medical practice, the resolution of the ethical and legal issues that it provokes will probably remain inconclusive and a matter of concern.
Similar articles
-
Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?Calif Law Rev. 1991 Mar;79(2):499-540. Calif Law Rev. 1991. PMID: 11659841 No abstract available.
-
Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.Hastings Law J. 1986 May;37(5):703-63. Hastings Law J. 1986. PMID: 11655855 No abstract available.
-
Treating fetuses: the patient as person.J Med Humanit. 1991 Winter;12(4):173-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01138952. J Med Humanit. 1991. PMID: 11652029
-
Ethical challenges in the new world of maternal-fetal surgery.Semin Perinatol. 2016 Jun;40(4):227-33. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Semin Perinatol. 2016. PMID: 26804036 Review.
-
The fetus as patient: implications for directive versus nondirective counseling for fetal benefit.Fetal Diagn Ther. 1991;6(1-2):93-100. doi: 10.1159/000263630. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1991. PMID: 1768352 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical