Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):713-722.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01820. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

Gefitinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin as Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: Final Overall Survival Analysis of CTONG1104 Phase III Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Gefitinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin as Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: Final Overall Survival Analysis of CTONG1104 Phase III Trial

Wen-Zhao Zhong et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: ADJUVANT-CTONG1104 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01405079), a randomized phase III trial, showed that adjuvant gefitinib treatment significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VP) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) results.

Methods: From September 2011 to April 2014, 222 patients from 27 sites were randomly assigned 1:1 to adjuvant gefitinib (n = 111) or VP (n = 111). Patients with resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) NSCLC and EGFR-activating mutation were enrolled, receiving gefitinib for 24 months or VP every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was DFS (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Secondary end points included OS, 3-, 5-year (y) DFS rates, and 5-year OS rate. Post hoc analysis was conducted for subsequent therapy data.

Results: Median follow-up was 80.0 months. Median OS (ITT) was 75.5 and 62.8 months with gefitinib and VP, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.36; P = .674); respective 5-year OS rates were 53.2% and 51.2% (P = .784). Subsequent therapy was administered upon progression in 68.4% and 73.6% of patients receiving gefitinib and VP, respectively. Subsequent targeted therapy contributed most to OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.38) compared with no subsequent therapy. Updated 3y DFS rates were 39.6% and 32. 5% with gefitinib and VP (P = .316) and 5y DFS rates were 22. 6% and 23.2% (P = .928), respectively.

Conclusion: Adjuvant therapy with gefitinib in patients with early-stage NSCLC and EGFR mutation demonstrated improved DFS over standard of care chemotherapy. Although this DFS advantage did not translate to a significant OS difference, OS with adjuvant gefitinib was one of the longest observed in this patient group compared with historic data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Consort diagram showing patient disposition for the ADJUVANT-CTONG1104 study (data cutoff: April 19, 2020). DFS, disease-free survival; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ITT, intention-to-treat; PP, per protocol; VP, vinorelbine plus cisplatin.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Overall survival in the (A) ITT population and (B) PP population, and (C) subgroup analysis between gefitinib and VP groups. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; PP, per protocol; VP, vinorelbine plus cisplatin. *Univariate test; †multivariate test.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Subsequent treatment in the (A) ITT population, (B) overall survival, and (C) objective response rate for subsequent treatments. CR, complete response; DFS, disease-free survival; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NC, not calculable; NR, not reached; ITT, intention-to-treat; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; VP, vinorelbine plus cisplatin. *Univariate test.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Updated disease-free survival for the (A) ITT and (B) PP populations. HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; PP, per protocol; VP, vinorelbine plus cisplatin. *Univariate test.

Comment in

References

    1. Burdett S Pignon JP Tierney J, et al. : Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD011430, 2015 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng H Li XJ Wang XJ, et al. : A meta-analysis of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs for patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 137:7-13, 2019 - PubMed
    1. Yuan Y Huang Q Gu C, et al. : Disease-free survival improved by use of adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 9:5314-5321, 2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pisters KM Evans WK Azzoli CG, et al. : Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I-IIIA resectable non small-cell lung cancer guideline. J Clin Oncol 25:5506-5518, 2007 - PubMed
    1. Xiu-Yi Zhi Jin-Ming Yu, and Yuan-Kai Shi. Chinese guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of primary lung cancer (2015 version). Cancer 121:3165-3181, 2015. Cancer 122:162, 2016 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data