Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;77(4):865-883.
doi: 10.1002/jclp.23097. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research

Joshua N Hook  1 , Todd W Hall  2 , Don E Davis  3 , Daryl R Van Tongeren  4 , Mackenzie Conner  2
Affiliations

The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research

Joshua N Hook et al. J Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

The Enneagram is a typology that many clients use to understand their personality and interpersonal patterns, despite some concerns about its validity. Thus, the purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and clinician-friendly review of the extant empirical work on the Enneagram. After reviewing 104 independent samples, we found mixed evidence of reliability and validity. In terms of strengths, some factor analytic work has shown partial alignment with prior theorizing, and subscales show theory-consistent relationships with other constructs such as the Big 5. Also, several studies found the Enneagram was helpful for personal/spiritual growth. However, factor analytic work has typically found fewer than nine factors, and no work has used clustering techniques to derive the nine types. Also, there is little research supporting secondary aspects of Enneagram theory, such as wings and intertype movement. We conclude by highlighting directions for future research and implications for clinical practice.

Keywords: assessment; enneagram; personality; spirituality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Arthur, K. B. (2008). Attachment styles and enneagram types: Development and testing of an integrated model for use in marriage and family therapy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
    1. Arthur, K., & Allen, K. (2010). The nature of love: Understanding the Enneagram types as nine expressions of attachment. The Enneagram Journal, 3(1), 6-22.
    1. Bartram, D., & Brown, A. (2005). Putting the person into personality: SHL Short research report 2005. SHL White paper.
    1. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
    1. Becker, M. (1992). Empirical studies of the enneagram: Foundations and comparison. In A. Ebert, & M. Kustemacher (Eds.), Experiencing the enneagram (P. Heinegg, Trans.). Crossroad.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources