Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 15;20(24):7173.
doi: 10.3390/s20247173.

Radio Resource Dimensioning for Low Delay Access in Licensed OFDMA IoT Networks

Affiliations

Radio Resource Dimensioning for Low Delay Access in Licensed OFDMA IoT Networks

Yi Yu et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the radio resource planning in the uplink of licensed Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) based Internet of Things (IoT) networks. The average behavior of the network is considered by assuming that active sensors and collectors are distributed according to independent random Poisson Point Process (PPP) marked by channel randomness. Our objective is to statistically determine the optimal total number of Radio Resources (RRs) required for a typical cell. On one hand, the allocated bandwidth should be sufficiently large to support the traffic of the devices and to guarantee a low access delay. On the other hand, the over-dimensioning is costly from an operator point of view and induces spectrum wastage. For this sake, we propose statistical tools derived from stochastic geometry to evaluate, adjust and adapt the allocated bandwidth according to the network parameters, namely the required Quality of Service (QoS) in terms of rate and access delay, the density of the active sensors, the collector intensities, the antenna configurations and the transmission modes. The optimal total number of RRs required for a typical cell is then calculated by jointly considering the constraints of low access delay, limited power per RR, target data rate and network outage probability. Different types of networks are considered including Single Input Single Output (SISO) systems, Single Input Multiple Output (SIMO) systems using antenna selection or Maximum Ratio Combiner (MRC), and Multiuser Multiple Input Multiple Output (MU-MIMO) systems using Zero-Forcing decoder.

Keywords: LPWAN; licensed OFDMA-based IoT; resource planning; stochastic geometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Network model: typical cell and active nodes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MU-MIMO: nu users are simultaneously scheduled on the same radio-resource.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of the scheduling with nu=4. The number of RR is adjusted with respect to the furthest node in each group, to say i, situated at distance ri corresponding to the radius of the ball containing inu1 nodes.Distance based multiuser scheduling scheme
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver diversity with SIMO configuration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean number of required Radio Resources (RRs) in a typical cell considering λb ranges from 0.3 to 0.9 nodes/km2 with λa=5.5 nodes/km2, τmax=1 ms.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Total number of required RRs in a typical cell versus the collector intensity λb with λa=5.5 nodes/km2, τmax=1 ms.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of Nt total number of RRs required for the typical cell in which the maximal delay τmax=1 ms, λa=5.5 nodes/km2 and λb=0.5 nodes/km2.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Low access delay τ with statistical dimensioning in which the maximal delay τmax=1 ms, λa=5.5 nodes/km2 and λb=0.5 nodes/km2.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Comparison between theoretical and empirical Nt values in which λa=5.5 nodes/km2 and λb=0.5 nodes/km2.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Total number of required RRs in a typical cell with respect to maximal access delay τmax with λa=5.5 nodes/km2 and λb=0.5 nodes/km2.

References

    1. Mekki K., Bajic E., Chaxel F., Meyer F. A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment. ICT Express. 2019;5:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2017.12.005. - DOI
    1. Martinez B., Adelantado F., Bartoli A., Vilajosana X. Exploring the performance boundaries of NB-IoT. IEEE Internet Things. 2019;6:5702–5712. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2904799. - DOI
    1. v13.1.0, G.T Cellular System Support for Ultra Low Complexity and Low throughput Internet of Things. [(accessed on 14 November 2020)]; Available online: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetai....
    1. Al-Rubaye S., Al-Dulaimi A., Cosmas J., Anpalagan A. Call admission control for non-standalone 5G ultra-dense networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2018;22:1058–1061. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2813360. - DOI
    1. Bankov D., Didenko A., Khorov E., Lyakhov A. OFDMA uplink scheduling in IEEE 802.11 ax networks; Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC); Kansas City, MO, USA. 20–24 May 2018; pp. 1–6.