Transition From Temporary to Durable Circulatory Support Systems
- PMID: 33334424
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.036
Transition From Temporary to Durable Circulatory Support Systems
Abstract
Background: The decision to implant durable mechanical circulatory systems (MCSs) in patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is challenging due to expected poor outcomes in these patients.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify outcome predictors that may facilitate future patient selection and decision making.
Methods: The Durable MCS after ECLS registry is a multicenter retrospective study that gathered data on consecutive patients who underwent MCS implantation after ECLS between January 2010 and August 2018 in 11 high-volume European centers. Several perioperative parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was survival at 1 year after durable MCS implantation.
Results: A total of 531 durable MCSs after ECLS were implanted during this period. The average patient age was 53 ± 12 years old. ECLS cannulation was peripheral in 87% of patients and 33% of the patients had history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECLS implantation. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 77%, 53%, and 43%, respectively. The following predictors for 1-year outcome have been observed: age, female sex, lactate value, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease XI score, history of atrial fibrillation, redo surgery, and body mass index >30 kg/m2. On the basis of this data, a risk score and an app to estimate 1-year mortality was created.
Conclusions: The outcome in patients receiving durable MCS after ECLS remains limited, yet preoperative factors may allow differentiating futile patients from those with significant survival benefit.
Keywords: extracorporeal life support; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; mechanical circulatory support; outcome; predictors.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridge to Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support: Discerning Futility From Heroic Therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2965-2967. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.001. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 33334425 No abstract available.
-
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Intervention in Need of a Strategy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 20;77(15):1954. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.054. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33858632 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Intervention in Need of a Strategy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 20;77(15):1954-1955. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.055. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33858633 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
