Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22236.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78992-x.

Job loss and health threatening events modulate risk-taking behaviours in the Covid-19 emergency

Affiliations

Job loss and health threatening events modulate risk-taking behaviours in the Covid-19 emergency

Caterina Galandra et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Covid-19 pandemic is exerting a tragic impact all around the world. First-person experience of life-threatening and stressful events can modify individuals' risk perception, and, consequently, risk-taking behaviours. Here we investigated risk-taking profiles in 130 Italian residents, and compared healthcare to non-healthcare workers, during the lockdown phase. We ad hoc developed the "Covid-19 Risk Task", including the classic monetary Holt-Laury Paired Lottery Task (Monetary Condition, MC) and two new ecological conditions exploring Covid-19 related risk-taking aptitudes in relation to different health (Health Status Condition, HsC) and employment (Employment Status Condition, EsC) outcomes. Results showed that, in the whole sample, individuals were more risk-averse in MC than in HsC and EsC. Moreover, a payoff increase produced a shift toward more risk-averse behaviours in MC, but not in HsC and EsC, where we found an opposite trend suggesting a more risk-loving behaviour. Finally, we found that healthcare workers were significantly less risk-averse compared to non-healthcare workers in EsC, but not in MC and HsC. These findings provided evidence of the possible effects of Covid-19 outbreak on risk-taking aptitudes. The negative impact on human choices and, consequently, on the whole world economy of this catastrophic life event must not be underestimated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of risk-taking profiles. The figure shows the proportion of different risk-taking profiles—i.e., risk-loving (blue sector), risk-neutral (green sector), mildly (yellow sector) and highly (red sector) risk-averse individuals—in the three Cov19-RT conditions considering the whole sample (n = 130), the healthcare workers group (n = 65) and non-healthcare workers group (n = 65).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incentive effect in the Cov19-RT conditions. The figure illustrates the incentive effect in the three different conditions in the whole group (n = 130), with the blue line representing the Series 1 (low payoff) and the green one depicting Series 2 (high payoff). In particular, we report, for each Series and condition, the average response in terms of percentages of safe choices (y-axis) for each of the 10 lottery rows (x-axis).

References

    1. Cassar A, Healy A, von Kessler C. Trust, risk, and time preferences after a natural disaster: experimental evidence from Thailand. World Dev. 2017;94:90–105. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.042. - DOI
    1. Cameron, L. & Shah, M. Risk-Taking Behavior in the Wake of Natural Disasters. (2013).
    1. Voors MJ, et al. Violent conflict and behavior: A field experiment in Burundi. Am. Econ. Rev. 2012;102:941–964. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.2.941. - DOI
    1. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263–292. doi: 10.2307/1914185. - DOI
    1. Jakiela P, Ozier O. The impact of violence on individual risk preferences: evidence from a natural experiment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2019;101:547–559. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00763. - DOI