Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 8:14:4319-4323.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S283370. eCollection 2020.

Surgical Grade and Repeat Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Procedures with Risk Stratification and Educational Considerations

Affiliations

Surgical Grade and Repeat Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Procedures with Risk Stratification and Educational Considerations

Oliver Francis Riley et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background/aims: Peripheral laser iridotomy (PLI) is a commonly performed procedure. While effective, repeat procedures (RPs) may be required for a variety of causes. We report the causes and rate of RP PLI and whether surgical grade is a risk factor.

Methods: Two years of retrospective data from 282 patients who had undergone PLI at a single UK ophthalmology department were retrieved using an electronic medical record system (Medisoft, Leeds, UK).

Results: A total of 253 patients underwent analysis with 20 requiring RPs. Our data identified a correlation between experience of the operating surgeon and an increase in RP rate, with statistical significance (p=0.036) observed between consultants and registrars. No other statistically significant risk factors were identified from our study. Prescriber preference for iopidine was observed. From our findings and the current literature, prognostic factors that appear to influence RP rate include surgical grade, patient compliance, Asian ethnicity, and anticoagulation.

Conclusion: RP rate increases in PLI when a junior surgeon is performing the procedure, and thus cases with established prognostic factors for RPs should have senior input. Formal and standardized YAG-laser training should be implemented alongside risk stratification of patients to improve both trainee education and patient care.

Keywords: education; glaucoma; iris; laser treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A, B) Comparison of RP rates by grade of surgeon: (A) decrease in RP rate with greater experience of operating surgeon; (B) statistically significant difference (p=0.036) observed in RP rate between consultants and SpRs. Note the surgical grades.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238–242. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michelessi M, Lindsley K. Peripheral iridotomy for pigmentary glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005655.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. RCOPHTH. Final commissioning guide: glaucoma (recommendations). Clinical Council for Eye Health Commissioning, NICE Accredited. 2016. Available from: www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Glaucoma-Commissioning-Guid.... Accessed November22, 2020.
    1. Wolf ZR, Hughes RG. Error Reporting and Disclosure. In: Hughes RG, Editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); April, 2008. Chapter 35 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2652/. Accessed November22, 2020. - PubMed
    1. Narendran N, Jaycock P, Johnston R, et al. The cataract national dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss. Eye. 2009;23(1):31–37. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6703049 - DOI - PubMed