Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;48(6):2024-2030.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05160-8. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

Prognostic implications of dual tracer PET/CT: PSMA ligand and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients undergoing [177Lu]PSMA radioligand therapy

Affiliations

Prognostic implications of dual tracer PET/CT: PSMA ligand and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients undergoing [177Lu]PSMA radioligand therapy

Kerstin Michalski et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu-labeled PSMA ligands has achieved remarkable results in advanced disease stages of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, not all patients benefit from this therapy. Different treatment responses could be explained by tumor heterogeneity triggered by progression and the number of prior treatments. PSMA-negative lesions can be missed on PSMA ligand PET/CT, which subsequently results in an underestimation of tumor burden. Conversely, high FDG uptake may also be an indicator of tumor aggressiveness and thus a poor prognostic marker for response to RLT and overall survival (OS). The aim of this analysis was to investigate the prognostic value of combined PSMA ligand PET/CT and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT for outcome prediction in patients undergoing RLT.

Materials and methods: This bicentric analysis included 54 patients with mCRPC who underwent both FDG and PSMA ligand PET/CT imaging before RLT. In all patients, the pattern of PSMA ligand and FDG uptake was visually assessed. Patients with at least one FDG-positive, but PSMA-negative (FDG+/PSMA-) lesions were compared to patients without any FDG+/PSMA- lesions. A log-rank analysis was used to assess the difference in OS between subgroups.

Results: Median OS was 11 ± 1.8 months (95% CI 7.4-14.6). A significantly lower OS (p < 0.001) was found in patients with at least one FDG+/PSMA- lesion at baseline PET/CTs (n = 18) with a median OS of 6.0 ± 0.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-7.0 months). In comparison, patients without any FDG+/PSMA- lesions (n = 36) had a median OS of 16.0 ± 2.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-20.8 months).

Conclusion: FDG+/PSMA- lesions are a negative predictor of overall survival in patients with mCRPC undergoing RLT. However, it remains to be determined if patients with FDG+/PSMA- lesions should be excluded from PSMA RLT.

Keywords: FDG; PET/CT; PSMA; Prostate cancer; Radioligand therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Corresponding axial slices of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET (first column), FDG PET (second column), and CT (third column). a 72-year-old patient with FDG+/PSMA- right hilar lymph node metastasis (black arrow; histologically proven metastasis from prostate cancer). b 65-year old patient with concordant FDG+/PSMA+ bone metastases. Fixed inverse gray-scale are displayed with SUV window setting from 0 to 10 ([18F]PSMA-1007 PET) and 0 to 5 (FDG PET), respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier curves of median overall survival (OS) of patients with FDG+/PSMA- lesions. These patients (n = 18, red line) had an OS of 6.0 ± 0.5 months (95% CI 5.0–7.0 months), whereas the other patients (n = 36, blue line) showed an OS of 16.0 ± 2.4 months (95% CI 11.2–20.8 months; p < 0.001)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hotte SJ, Saad F. Current management of castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont). 2010;17 Suppl 2:S72–9. doi:10.3747/co.v17i0.718. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, Molina A, Logothetis CJ, de Souza P, et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:138–148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, Loriot Y, Sternberg CN, Higano CS, et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:424–433. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–1512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040720. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berthold DR, Pond GR, Soban F, de Wit R, Eisenberger M, Tannock IF. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26:242–245. doi: 10.1200/jco.2007.12.4008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms