Research on the dimensional accuracy of customized bone augmentation combined with 3D-printing individualized titanium mesh: A retrospective case series study
- PMID: 33336492
- DOI: 10.1111/cid.12966
Research on the dimensional accuracy of customized bone augmentation combined with 3D-printing individualized titanium mesh: A retrospective case series study
Abstract
Background: Few studies have focused on the dimensional accuracy of customized bone grafting by means of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with 3D-Printed Individual Titanium Mesh (3D-PITM).
Purpose: Digital technologies were applied to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of customized bone augmentation with 3D-PITM with a two-stage technique.
Materials and methods: Sixteen patients were included in this study. The CBCT data of post-GBR (immediate post-GBR) and post-implantation (immediate post-implant placement) were 3D reconstructed and compared with the pre-surgical planned bone augmentation. The dimensional differences were evaluated by superimposition using the Materialize 3-matic software.
Results: The superimposition analysis showed that the maximum deviations of contour between were 3.4 mm, and the average differences of the augmentation contour were 0.5 ± 0.4 and 0.6 ± 0.5 mm respectively. The planned volume of bone regeneration was approximately equal to the amount of regenerated bone present 6 to 9 months after the surgical procedure. On average, the vertical gain in bone height was about 0.5 mm less than planned. And, the horizontal bone gain on the straight buccal of the dental implants and 2 to 4 mm apical of the platform fell also about a 0.5 mm short on average. Statistically significant differences were observed between the augmented volume of virtual and post-GBR, and the horizontal bone gain of post-implantation on the level of 4 mm apical to the implant platform (P < .05).
Conclusions: The dimensional accuracy of customized bone augmentation with the 3D-PITM approach needs further improvement and compared to other surgical approaches of bone augmentation.
Keywords: 3D-printing individualized titanium mesh; computer aided design; customized bone augmentation; dimensional accuracy; guided bone generation.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Draenert FG, Huetzen D, Neff A, Mueller WE. Vertical bone augmentation procedures: basics and techniques in dental implantology. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:1605-1613.
-
- Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, VWorthington H, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4(4):CD003607.
-
- Benic GI, Hämmerle HFC. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66:13-40.
-
- Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:299-307.
-
- Basler T, Naenni N, Schneider D, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE, Thoma DS. Randomized controlled clinical study assessing two membranes for guided bone regeneration of peri-implant bone defects: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:499-507.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 11872135/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 12072055/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 31100690/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- CSTC2018(C)XXYFJG0004/the Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau's new high-end R&D institution
- CXTDG201602006/Program for Innovation Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
