Comparative review and the recent progress in detection technologies of meat product adulteration
- PMID: 33337107
- DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12579
Comparative review and the recent progress in detection technologies of meat product adulteration
Abstract
Meat adulteration, mainly for the purpose of economic pursuit, is widespread and leads to serious public health risks, religious violations, and moral loss. Rapid, effective, accurate, and reliable detection technologies are keys to effectively supervising meat adulteration. Considering the importance and rapid advances in meat adulteration detection technologies, a comprehensive review to summarize the recent progress in this area and to suggest directions for future progress is beneficial. In this review, destructive meat adulteration technologies based on DNA, protein, and metabolite analyses and nondestructive technologies based on spectroscopy were comparatively analyzed. The advantages and disadvantages, application situations of these technologies were discussed. In the future, determining suitable indicators or markers is particularly important for destructive methods. To improve sensitivity and save time, new interdisciplinary technologies, such as biochips and biosensors, are promising for application in the future. For nondestructive techniques, convenient and effective chemometric models are crucial, and the development of portable devices based on these technologies for onsite monitoring is a future trend. Moreover, omics technologies, especially proteomics, are important methods in laboratory detection because they enable multispecies detection and unknown target screening by using mass spectrometry databases.
Keywords: adulteration; analytical methods; destructive technologies; meat; nondestructive technologies.
© 2020 Institute of Food Technologists®.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abbas, O., Zadravec, M., Baeten, V., Mikus, T., Lesic, T., Vulic, A., … Pleadin, J. (2018). Analytical methods used for the authentication of food of animal origin. Food Chemistry, 246, 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.11.007
-
- Abu-Ghoush, M., Fasfous, I., Al-Degs, Y., Al-Holy, M., Issa, A. A., Al-Reyahi, A. Y., & Alshathri, A. A. (2017). Application of mid-infrared spectroscopy and PLS-Kernel calibration for quick detection of pork in higher value meat mixes. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 11, 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9402-4
-
- Ahamad, M. N. U., Hossain, M. A. M., Uddin, S. M. K., Sultana, S., Nizar, N. N. A., Bonny, S. Q., … Ali, M. E. (2019). Tetraplex real-time PCR with TaqMan probes for discriminatory detection of cat, rabbit, rat and squirrel DNA in food products. European Food Research and Technology, 245, 2183-2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03326-9
-
- Ahmed, N., Sangale, D., Tiknaik, A., Prakash, B., Hange, R., Sanil, R., .... Khedkar, G. (2018). Authentication of origin of meat species processed under various Indian culinary procedures using DNA barcoding. Food Control, 90, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.012
-
- Al-Kahtani, H. A., Ismail, E. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2017). Pork detection in binary meat mixtures and some commercial food products using conventional and real-time PCR techniques. Food Chemistry, 219, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.108
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical