Rigor and reproducibility training for first year medical students in research pathways
- PMID: 33337579
- PMCID: PMC8212706
- DOI: 10.1111/cts.12966
Rigor and reproducibility training for first year medical students in research pathways
Abstract
In the Spring of 2020, we launched a rigor and reproducibility curriculum for medical students in research training programs. This required class consisted of eight, 2-h sessions, which transitioned to remote learning in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. The class was graded as pass/fail. Flipped classroom techniques, with multiple hands-on exercises, were developed for first-year medical students (MD/PhD [n = 9], Clinical and Translational Research Pathway (CTRP) students [n = 9]). Four focus groups (n = 13 students) and individual interviews with the two instructors were conducted in May 2020. From individual interviews with instructors and focus groups with medical students, the course and its components were favorably reviewed. Students thought the course was novel, important, relevant, and practical-and teaching strategies were effective (e.g., short lectures, interactive small group exercises, and projects). Most students expressed concerns about lack of time for course preparation. Sharper focus and streamlining of preparation work may be required. Pre- and post-student self-assessments of rigor and reproducibility competencies showed average post-scores ranging from high/moderate to strong understanding (n = 11). We conclude that rigor and reproducibility can be taught to first-year medical students in research pathways programs in a highly interactive and remote format. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? The rigor and reproducibility crisis calls for robust training of scientists in best practices for enhancing the research rigor. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? We evaluated a curriculum to develop physician-scientists skilled at documenting research workflow from idea generation to publication with reproducibility in mind. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? Highly interactive exercises, coupled with a hands-on replication group project provide a pathway for students to gain competencies important to the improvement of rigor and reproducibility in scientific research. Rigor and reproducibility can be taught in a highly interactive format and using a remote format. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE? Formal training is needed to raise awareness of the reproducibility crisis and improve the rigor of research conducted. If techniques taught are used, the transparency and reproducibility of clinical and translational science will be improved.
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no competing interests for this work.
Similar articles
-
The flipped classroom: a novel approach to physical examination skills for osteopathic medical students.J Osteopath Med. 2021 Feb 26;121(5):475-481. doi: 10.1515/jom-2020-0198. J Osteopath Med. 2021. PMID: 33694343
-
Using the Flipped Classroom to Bridge the Gap to Generation Y.Ochsner J. 2016 Spring;16(1):32-6. Ochsner J. 2016. PMID: 27046401 Free PMC article.
-
Flipped classroom frameworks improve efficacy in undergraduate practical courses - a quasi-randomized pilot study in otorhinolaryngology.BMC Med Educ. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1398-5. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 30514278 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
MiSet RFC Standards: Defining a Universal Minimum Set of Standards Required for Reproducibility and Rigor in Research Flow Cytometry Experiments.Cytometry A. 2020 Feb;97(2):148-155. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23940. Epub 2019 Nov 26. Cytometry A. 2020. PMID: 31769204 Review.
-
Decatastrophizing research irreproducibility.Biochem Pharmacol. 2024 Oct;228:116090. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116090. Epub 2024 Feb 24. Biochem Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38408680 Review.
Cited by
-
Design principles for fully online flipped learning in health professions education: a systematic review of research during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03782-0. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 36229820 Free PMC article.
-
Time of day as a critical variable in biology.BMC Biol. 2022 Jun 15;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01333-z. BMC Biol. 2022. PMID: 35705939 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rigor and reproducibility instruction in academic medical libraries.J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jul 1;110(3):281-293. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1443. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022. PMID: 36589297 Free PMC article.
-
[High interaction potential of online-only courses with breakout sessions-results of a pilot study].HNO. 2024 Mar;72(3):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01407-6. Epub 2024 Jan 23. HNO. 2024. PMID: 38260983 Free PMC article. German.
References
-
- Bollen K, Cacioppo J, Kaplan R, Krosnick J, Olds J.Social, behavioral, and economic sciences perspectives on robust and reliable science. Report of the Subcommittee on Replicability in Science Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. 2015. <https://www.nsf.gov/sce/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable_Research_Re...>. Accessed December 4, 2020.
-
- Pellizzari E, Lohr K, Blatecky A, Creel D. A Primer on Semantics and Implications for Research. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press. 2017. <https://www.rti.org/rti‐press‐publication/reproducibility‐primer/fulltex...>. Accessed December 4, 2020.
-
- Does the Public Trust Science? Trust and Confidence at the Intersections of the Life Sciences and Society . A Workshop Summary. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. <https://www.nap.edu/download21798>. Accessed December 4, 2020.
-
- Baker M. Is there a reproducibility crisis? A Nature survey lifts the lid on how researchers view the ‘crisis’ rocking science and what they think will help. Nature. 2016;533:452‐454. - PubMed
-
- Marcus E. Credibility and reproducibility. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(6):771‐772. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous