Acute Performance Enhancement Following Squats Combined With Elastic Bands on Short Sprint and Vertical Jump Height in Female Athletes
- PMID: 33337702
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003881
Acute Performance Enhancement Following Squats Combined With Elastic Bands on Short Sprint and Vertical Jump Height in Female Athletes
Abstract
Krčmár, M, Krčmárová, B, Bakaľár, I, and Šimonek, J. Acute performance enhancement after squats combined with elastic bands on short sprint and vertical jump height in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res 35(2): 318-324, 2021-The main purpose of this study was to compare back squats with and without elastic bands on sprint and vertical jump height. Fourteen female athletes (21.9 ± 2.3 years; 177.5 ± 6.36 cm; 66.2 ± 6.2 kg; 1 repetition maximum [1RM]/ body mass: 1.96 ± 0.14) agreed to participate. On 4 separate days, athletes walked freely for 5 minutes (CON), performed 3 sets of 4 repetitions at 85% of their 1RM with 20% or 30% (BAND20 or BAND30) of the total resistance originated from elastic bands, or performed 3 sets and 4 repetitions at 85% of their 1RM with an isoinertial load (ISO) before performance tests. Posttesting began 5 and 10 minutes after the last set of squats and included sprints over 3, 5, and 10-m, squat jump (SJ), and countermovement (CMJ) vertical jump height. The results of this study show that all postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) protocols significantly improved 10-m sprint time (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01). Only BAND30 significantly improved 3-m and 5-m sprint times at both times of posttesting (p < 0.01). Comparison of PAPE protocols showed a significant difference when comparing BAND30 vs. ISO in SJ height in favor of BAND30 only when the best SJ height results from both posttesting times were selected (p < 0.01, g = 1.08). The results of this study suggest that all PAPE protocols were able to enhance short sprints and vertical jump height, but it seems that there is a greater trend to achieve better performance after performing the BAND30 protocol that can be seen by higher effect sizes achieved almost in all tests compared with the other PAPE protocols.
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
References
-
- Ah Sue R, Adams KJ, DeBeliso M. Optimal timing for post-activation potentiation in women collegiate volleyball players. Sports (Basel) 4: 27, 2016.
-
- Baker D. Using strength platforms for explosive performance. Part II: developing athletic capacity. In: High Performance Training for Sports. Joyce D, Lewindon D, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2014. pp. 127–144.
-
- Beato M, Stiff A, Coratella G. Effects of postactivation potentiation after an eccentric overload bout on countermovement jump and lower-limb muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res 2019. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003005. Epub ahead of print. - DOI
-
- Bevan RH, Cunningham DJ, Tooley EP, et al. Influence of postactivation potentiation on sprinting performance in professional rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 24: 701–705, 2010.
-
- Blazevich JB, Babault N. Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: Historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues. Front Physiol 10: 1359, 2019.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
