Review: Optimizing DMEK Technique, 2018-2020
- PMID: 33337793
- DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000340
Review: Optimizing DMEK Technique, 2018-2020
Conflict of interest statement
Dr C.S.S. receives royalties from Network Medical Coronet for Intellectual Property. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 
    - Chamberlain W, Lin CC, Austin A, et al. Descemet endothelial thickness comparison trial: a randomized trial comparing ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:19–26.
 
- 
    - 2019 Eye Banking Statistical Report. Eye Bank Association of America. 2019. Available at: https://restoresight.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2019-EBAA-Stat-Repor... . Accessed October 8, 2020.
 
- 
    - Tran KD, Dye PK, Odell K, et al. Evaluation and quality assessment of prestripped, preloaded descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea. 2017;36:484–490.
 
- 
    - Wolle MA, DeMill DL, Johnson L, et al. Quantitative analysis of endothelial cell loss in preloaded descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea. 2017;36:1295–1301.
 
- 
    - Rickmann A, Wahl S, Hofmann N, et al. Comparison of preloaded grafts for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a novel preloaded transport cartridge compared to conventional precut grafts. Cell Tissue Bank. 2020;21:205–213.
 
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
 
        