Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Dec 18;16(12):e1008485.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008485. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Ten simple rules for creating a brand-new virtual academic meeting (even amid a pandemic)

Affiliations
Editorial

Ten simple rules for creating a brand-new virtual academic meeting (even amid a pandemic)

Scott Rich et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Abstract

The increased democratization of the creation, implementation, and attendance of academic conferences has been a serendipitous benefit of the movement toward virtual meetings. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the transition to online conferences and, in parallel, their democratization, by necessity. This manifests not just in the mitigation of barriers to attending traditional physical conferences but also in the presentation of new, and more importantly attainable, opportunities for young scientists to carve out a niche in the landscape of academic meetings. Here, we describe an early "proof of principle" of this democratizing power via our experience organizing the Canadian Computational Neuroscience Spotlight (CCNS; crowdcast.io/e/CCNS), a free 2-day virtual meeting that was built entirely amid the pandemic using only virtual tools. While our experience was unique considering the obstacles faced in creating a conference during a pandemic, this was not the only factor differentiating both our experience and the resulting meeting from other contemporary online conferences. Specifically, CCNS was crafted entirely by early career researchers (ECRs) without any sponsors or partners, advertised primarily using social media and "word of mouth," and designed specifically to highlight and engage trainees. From this experience, we have distilled "10 simple rules" as a blueprint for the design of new virtual academic meetings, especially in the absence of institutional support or partnerships, in this unprecedented environment. By highlighting the lessons learned in implementing our meeting under these arduous circumstances, we hope to encourage other young scientists to embrace this challenge, which would serve as a critical next step in further democratizing academic meetings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. A map of the locations of the registrants for the Canadian Computational Neuroscience Spotlight, generated via the Crowdcast.io platform.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Viglione G. A year without conferences? How the coronavirus pandemic could change research. Nature. 2020;579 (7799):327–8. 10.1038/d41586-020-00786-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Achakulvisut T, Ruangrong T, Acuna DE, Wyble B, Goodman D, Kording K. neuromatch: Algorithms to match scientists. elife. 2020.
    1. Titipat A, Tulakan R, Isil B, Wyble B, Kording KP, et al. Improving on legacy conferences by moving online. elife. 2020;9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weissgerber T, Bediako Y, De Winde CM, Ebrahimi H, Fernández-Chiappe F, Ilangovan V, et al. Point of View: Mitigating the impact of conference and travel cancellations on researchers’ futures. elife. 2020;9:e57032 10.7554/eLife.57032 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirchherr J, Biswas A. Expensive academic conferences give us old ideas and no new faces. The Guardian. 2017;30.

Publication types