Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 12;54(1):44-52.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

PD-1-Expressing SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cells Are Not Exhausted, but Functional in Patients with COVID-19

Affiliations

PD-1-Expressing SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cells Are Not Exhausted, but Functional in Patients with COVID-19

Min-Seok Rha et al. Immunity. .

Abstract

Memory T cell responses have been demonstrated in COVID-19 convalescents, but ex vivo phenotypes of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells have been unclear. We detected SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells by MHC class I multimer staining and examined their phenotypes and functions in acute and convalescent COVID-19. Multimer+ cells exhibited early differentiated effector-memory phenotypes in the early convalescent phase. The frequency of stem-like memory cells was increased among multimer+ cells in the late convalescent phase. Cytokine secretion assays combined with MHC class I multimer staining revealed that the proportion of interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-producing cells was significantly lower among SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells than those specific to influenza A virus. Importantly, the proportion of IFN-γ-producing cells was higher in PD-1+ cells than PD-1- cells among multimer+ cells, indicating that PD-1-expressing, SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells are not exhausted, but functional. Our current findings provide information for understanding of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells elicited by infection or vaccination.

Keywords: CD8(+) T cell; COVID-19; IFN-γ; MHC class I multimer; Memory T cell; PD-1; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Ex Vivo Detection of SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cells Using MHC Class I Multimers (A) Study scheme for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific MHC class I multimer+CD8+ T cells in PBMCs from individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. (B) SARS-CoV-2-specific MHC class I multimers used in this study. (C) Summary data for the detection rate of SARS-CoV-2-specific multimer+CD8+ T cells. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots (S269, n = 37; S1220, n = 2) showing the ex vivo detection of SARS-CoV-2 S269 and S1220 multimer+CD8+ T cells in the gate of CD3+ T cells. (E) Alignment of the amino acid sequences of SARS-CoV-2 S269 and S1220 peptides with other human coronaviruses. See also Figure S1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phenotypes of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Multimer+CD8+ T Cells in the Convalescent Phase of COVID-19 (A–H) PBMCs from convalescent patients were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots (n = 32) showing the percentages of indicated subsets among SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells. (B and C) The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells among total CD8+ T cells (B) and the percentages of the indicated subsets among SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells (C) in the early convalescent samples were compared between the non-severe (n = 11) and severe (n = 8) groups. (D and E) The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells among total CD8+ T cells (D) and the percentages of the indicated subsets among SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells (E) were compared between the early (n = 19) and late (n = 13) convalescent groups. (F) Correlation between the expression of the indicated markers in SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells and days post-symptom onset (n = 30). (G and H) The phenotypes of SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells (early convalescent phase, n = 19; late convalescent phase, n = 13) were compared with those of IAV MP58 multimer+CD8+ T cells (n = 11; 3 HDs and 8 convalescent individuals). Representative flow cytometry plots (early convalescent phase, n = 19; late convalescent phase, n = 13; IAV, n = 11) (G) and summary data (H) of the percentages of all indicated subsets among CD8+ T cells specific for each virus. Data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test (B–E and H) or Spearman correlation test (F). p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. See also Figure S2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proliferation and Effector Function of SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cells from Convalescent Patients (A) CTV-labeled PBMCs from convalescent COVID-19 patients (n = 6) were stimulated with S269 peptide (10 μg/mL) for 7 days and analyzed by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry plots show the frequency of CTVlow cells among SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells. (B–E) PBMCs were stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 S269 peptide (n = 10; 3 early convalescent samples with non-severe disease, 4 early convalescent samples with severe disease, and 3 late convalescent samples), CMV pp65495 peptide (n = 7; 4 HDs and 3 convalescent individuals), or IAV MP58 peptide (n = 7; 2 HDs and 5 convalescent individuals). The concentration of each peptide was 1 μg/mL. After 5.5 h of stimulation, CSAs were performed in combination with MHC class I multimer staining to analyze the frequency of IFN-γ-producing cells among MHC class I multimer+ cells. Representative flow cytometry plots (early convalescent samples with non-severe disease, n = 3; early convalescent samples with severe disease, n = 4; late convalescent samples, n = 3; IAV, n = 7) (B) and summary data (C) are presented. Horizontal lines represent the median. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots (n = 10) and (E) summary data showing the frequency of IFN-γ-producing cells among PD-1+ and PD-1 subpopulations of SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells from convalescent COVID-19 patients. (F and G) Sorted PD-1+CD8+ and sorted PD-1CD8+ T cells from PBMCs of COVID-19 patients (n = 3) were stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 S269 peptide (1 μg/mL) for 5.5 h and CSAs performed in combination with MHC class I multimer staining. Representative flow cytometry plots (n = 3) (F) and summary data (G) showing the frequency of IFN-γ-producing cells in the SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cell population among sorted PD-1+ and PD-1CD8+ T cells. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test (C) or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (E). ∗∗p < 0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phenotypes, Kinetics, and Effector Function of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Multimer+CD8+ T Cells in the Acute Phase of COVID-19. (A) PBMCs from patients in the acute phase of COVID-19 (n = 10) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Left, Representative flow cytometry plots (n = 10). Right, summary data for the expression of indicated markers in SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+CD8+ T cells. Data are presented as median and IQR. (B) The frequency and phenotypes of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells were examined during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in seven patients (P5, P15, P18, P74, and P76, severe disease; P12, non-severe disease; and P11, non-severe, asymptomatic). Viral titers (Ct values) were determined by real-time RT-PCR of RdRP (P5, P15, P18, P74, P76, and P12) or N (P11) genes in specimens from nasopharyngeal swabs serially obtained during the course of COVID-19. The viral titer and frequency of SARS-CoV-2 S269 multimer+ cells among total CD8+ T cells were plotted against days post-symptom onset (P5, P15, P18, P74, P76, and P12) or days post-admission (P11). The percentages of Ki-67+ (orange), perforin+granzyme B+ (blue), CD38+HLA-DR+ (pink), and PD-1+ (dark red) cells among multimer+ cells are presented. (C and D) PBMCs from P5 (14 days post-symptom onset), P12 (16 days post-symptom onset), P15 (15 days post-symptom onset), P74 (19 days post-symptom onset), and P76 (17 days post-symptom onset) were stimulated with S269 peptide (1 μg/mL) for 5.5 h and CSAs performed in combination with MHC class I multimer staining to analyze the phenotypes of IFN-γ-producing cells among MHC class I multimer+ cells. Representative flow cytometry plots (n = 5) (C) and summary data (D) show IFN-γ production according to the expression of PD-1, CD38, and HLA-DR in the gate of multimer+ cells.

References

    1. Altman J.D., Moss P.A., Goulder P.J., Barouch D.H., McHeyzer-Williams M.G., Bell J.I., McMichael A.J., Davis M.M. Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science. 1996;274:94–96. - PubMed
    1. Appay V., Dunbar P.R., Callan M., Klenerman P., Gillespie G.M., Papagno L., Ogg G.S., King A., Lechner F., Spina C.A. Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections. Nat. Med. 2002;8:379–385. - PubMed
    1. Chang J.T., Wherry E.J., Goldrath A.W. Molecular regulation of effector and memory T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:1104–1115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen G., Wu D., Guo W., Cao Y., Huang D., Wang H., Wang T., Zhang X., Chen H., Yu H. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:2620–2629. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Biasi S., Meschiari M., Gibellini L., Bellinazzi C., Borella R., Fidanza L., Gozzi L., Iannone A., Lo Tartaro D., Mattioli M. Marked T cell activation, senescence, exhaustion and skewing towards TH17 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3434. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types