Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 18;21(Suppl 2):142.
doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00949-w.

Irradiation induced inversions suppress recombination between the M locus and morphological markers in Aedes aegypti

Affiliations

Irradiation induced inversions suppress recombination between the M locus and morphological markers in Aedes aegypti

Antonios A Augustinos et al. BMC Genet. .

Abstract

Background: Aedes aegypti is the primary vector of arthropod-borne viruses and one of the most widespread and invasive mosquito species. Due to the lack of efficient specific drugs or vaccination strategies, vector population control methods, such as the sterile insect technique, are receiving renewed interest. However, availability of a reliable genetic sexing strategy is crucial, since there is almost zero tolerance for accidentally released females. Development of genetic sexing strains through classical genetics is hindered by genetic recombination that is not suppressed in males as is the case in many Diptera. Isolation of naturally-occurring or irradiation-induced inversions can enhance the genetic stability of genetic sexing strains developed through genetically linking desirable phenotypes with the male determining region.

Results: For the induction and isolation of inversions through irradiation, 200 male pupae of the 'BRA' wild type strain were irradiated at 30 Gy and 100 isomale lines were set up by crossing with homozygous 'red-eye' (re) mutant females. Recombination between re and the M locus and the white (w) gene (causing a recessive white eye phenotype when mutated) and the M locus was tested in 45 and 32 lines, respectively. One inversion (Inv35) reduced recombination between both re and the M locus, and wand the M locus, consistent with the presence of a rather extended inversion between the two morphological mutations, that includes the M locus. Another inversion (Inv5) reduced recombination only between w and the M locus. In search of naturally-occurring, recombination-suppressing inversions, homozygous females from the red eye and the white eye strains were crossed with seventeen and fourteen wild type strains collected worldwide, representing either recently colonized or long-established laboratory populations. Despite evidence of varying frequencies of recombination, no combination led to the elimination or substantial reduction of recombination.

Conclusion: Inducing inversions through irradiation is a feasible strategy to isolate recombination suppressors either on the M or the m chromosome for Aedes aegypti. Such inversions can be incorporated in genetic sexing strains developed through classical genetics to enhance their genetic stability and support SIT or other approaches that aim to population suppression through male-delivered sterility.

Keywords: Chromosomal rearrangements; Genetic sexing strains; Population suppression; Sterile insect technique; Vector control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A schematic representation of the genetic distances in the re-M-w genomic region and the crossing scheme for the isolation of irradiation induced recombination suppressors in the same region. a: A schematic representation of the rough genetic distances between re, w, and M locus, as derived from the combination of previously reported findings. b: Induction of inversions through irradiation and isolation of recombination suppressors between re and the M locus; c: Isolation of recombination suppressors between w and the M locus

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guzman MG, Harris E. Dengue. Lancet. 2015;385:453–465. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60572-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Betancourt-Cravioto M, Guzmán MG, Halstead SB, Harris E, et al. Approaches to refining estimates of global burden and economics of dengue. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003306. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diagne CT, Weaver SC, Dia I, Knight R, Guerbois M, Faye O, et al. Vector competence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes vittatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Senegal and Cape Verde archipelago for west African lineages of Chikungunya virus. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2014;91:635–641. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0627. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li MI, Wong PSJ, Ng LC, Tan CH. Oral susceptibility of Singapore Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) to Zika virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001792. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garcia R, Marchette NJ, Rudnick A. Isolation of Zika virus from Aedes Aegypti mosquitoes in Malaysia *. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 1969;18:411–415. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1969.18.411. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances