Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 29;56(4):500-509.
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa130.

Support for Alcohol Policies in Marginalized Populations

Affiliations

Support for Alcohol Policies in Marginalized Populations

Pamela J Trangenstein et al. Alcohol Alcohol. .

Abstract

Aim: Kingdon [(2014) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Essex. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited] argues that windows of opportunity to pass policies emerge when problems, solutions and policy support co-occur. This study aims to identify a set of alcohol policies with the potential to reduce alcohol-related disparities given high levels of support from marginalized groups, such as racial/ethnic minorities and lower-income groups.

Methods: This study used data from five US National Alcohol Surveys, which were based on household probability samples of adults in 1995 (n = 4243), 2000 (n = 5736), 2005 (n = 1445), 2010 (n = 4164) and 2015 (n = 4041). We used multiple logistic regression to determine the odds of policy support by racial/ethnic group and income level, considering price, place and marketing policies as well as individual-level interventions.

Results: Overall a majority of Americans supported banning alcohol sales in corner stores (59.4%), banning alcohol advertisements on television (55.5%), and establishing universal health coverage for alcohol treatment (80.0%). Support was particularly high among Blacks, Hispanics/Latinos and lower-income persons. Multivariate models showed that compared with White people, foreign-born Hispanics/Latinos had the most robust levels of support, including raising alcohol taxes (aOR = 2.40, 95% CI: 2.00, 2.88, P < 0.0001), banning alcohol sales in corner stores (aOR = 2.85, 95% CI: 2.22, 3.65, P < 0.0001) and reducing retail sales hours (aOR = 2.91, 95% CI: 2.38, 3.55, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Of the policies examined, banning alcohol sales at corner stores is most likely to be in a "window of opportunity" for reducing alcohol-related disparities. By simultaneously reducing population-level consumption and harms from others' drinking, place-based policies have the potential to reduce harms experienced by marginalized groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Conceptual framework of Kingdon’s Three Streams Theory.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arndt S, Acion L, White K (2013) How the states stack up: Disparities in substance abuse outpatient treatment completion rates for minorities. Drug Alcohol Depend 132:547–54. - PubMed
    1. Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, et al. (2010) Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and Public Policy, Vol. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    1. Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Dilonardo J, et al. (2012) Type of health insurance and the substance abuse treatment gap. J Subst Abuse Treat 42:289–300. - PubMed
    1. Buykx P, Gilligan C, Ward B, et al. (2015) Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk. Int J Drug Policy 26:371–9. - PubMed
    1. Buykx P, Li J, de Matos EG, et al. (2016) Factors associated with public support for alcohol policy in England: a population-based survey. The Lancet 388:S31.