Support for Alcohol Policies in Marginalized Populations
- PMID: 33341875
- PMCID: PMC8243274
- DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa130
Support for Alcohol Policies in Marginalized Populations
Abstract
Aim: Kingdon [(2014) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Essex. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited] argues that windows of opportunity to pass policies emerge when problems, solutions and policy support co-occur. This study aims to identify a set of alcohol policies with the potential to reduce alcohol-related disparities given high levels of support from marginalized groups, such as racial/ethnic minorities and lower-income groups.
Methods: This study used data from five US National Alcohol Surveys, which were based on household probability samples of adults in 1995 (n = 4243), 2000 (n = 5736), 2005 (n = 1445), 2010 (n = 4164) and 2015 (n = 4041). We used multiple logistic regression to determine the odds of policy support by racial/ethnic group and income level, considering price, place and marketing policies as well as individual-level interventions.
Results: Overall a majority of Americans supported banning alcohol sales in corner stores (59.4%), banning alcohol advertisements on television (55.5%), and establishing universal health coverage for alcohol treatment (80.0%). Support was particularly high among Blacks, Hispanics/Latinos and lower-income persons. Multivariate models showed that compared with White people, foreign-born Hispanics/Latinos had the most robust levels of support, including raising alcohol taxes (aOR = 2.40, 95% CI: 2.00, 2.88, P < 0.0001), banning alcohol sales in corner stores (aOR = 2.85, 95% CI: 2.22, 3.65, P < 0.0001) and reducing retail sales hours (aOR = 2.91, 95% CI: 2.38, 3.55, P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Of the policies examined, banning alcohol sales at corner stores is most likely to be in a "window of opportunity" for reducing alcohol-related disparities. By simultaneously reducing population-level consumption and harms from others' drinking, place-based policies have the potential to reduce harms experienced by marginalized groups.
© The Author(s) 2020. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Interested constituents: identifying groups to mobilize in community organizing efforts to strengthen alcohol control policies.Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):393-401. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1870690. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021. PMID: 33734822 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships between US state alcohol policies and alcohol outcomes: differences by gender and race/ethnicity.Addiction. 2020 Jul;115(7):1285-1294. doi: 10.1111/add.14937. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Addiction. 2020. PMID: 32026511 Free PMC article.
-
Public opinion on alcohol policies in the United States: results from a national survey.J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(3):303-27. J Public Health Policy. 2000. PMID: 11021045
-
Reducing alcohol harms whilst minimising impact on hospitality businesses: 'Sweetspot' policy options.Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Jul;129:104465. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104465. Epub 2024 Jun 5. Int J Drug Policy. 2024. PMID: 38843736 Review.
-
Treatment for alcohol-related problems: special populations: research opportunities.Recent Dev Alcohol. 2003;16:313-33. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47939-7_22. Recent Dev Alcohol. 2003. PMID: 12638644 Review.
Cited by
-
More Evidence to Support Increasing Alcohol Taxes: A Commentary on Jiang et al. (2022).J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Jul;83(4):525-527. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2022.83.525. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022. PMID: 35838429 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Establishing the Relative Accuracy of Using City Directories as Proxies to Define and Reconstruct Historical Alcohol Environments.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Jan;84(1):158-170. doi: 10.15288/jsad.21-00374. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023. PMID: 36799686 Free PMC article.
-
Interested constituents: identifying groups to mobilize in community organizing efforts to strengthen alcohol control policies.Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):393-401. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1870690. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021. PMID: 33734822 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arndt S, Acion L, White K (2013) How the states stack up: Disparities in substance abuse outpatient treatment completion rates for minorities. Drug Alcohol Depend 132:547–54. - PubMed
-
- Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, et al. (2010) Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and Public Policy, Vol. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
- Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Dilonardo J, et al. (2012) Type of health insurance and the substance abuse treatment gap. J Subst Abuse Treat 42:289–300. - PubMed
-
- Buykx P, Gilligan C, Ward B, et al. (2015) Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk. Int J Drug Policy 26:371–9. - PubMed
-
- Buykx P, Li J, de Matos EG, et al. (2016) Factors associated with public support for alcohol policy in England: a population-based survey. The Lancet 388:S31.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical