Molecular Nodal Restaging Based on CEACAM5, FGFR2b and PTPN11 Expression Adds No Relevant Clinical Information in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- PMID: 33342327
- DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1857479
Molecular Nodal Restaging Based on CEACAM5, FGFR2b and PTPN11 Expression Adds No Relevant Clinical Information in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Abstract
Background: The relapse rate in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is high, even in localized disease, suggesting that the current approach to pathological staging is insufficiently sensitive to detect occult micrometastases present in resected lymph nodes. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of the expression of embryonic molecular markers in histologically-negative lymph nodes of completely-resected NSCLC.
Methods: 76 completely-resected NSCLC patients were included: 60 pN0 and 16 pN1. Primary tumors and 347 lymph node were studied. CEACAM5, FGFR2b, and PTPN11 expression levels were evaluated through mRNA analysis using real-time RT-qPCR assay. Statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis test, Kaplan Meier curves, and log-rank tests.
Results: CEACAM5 expression levels were scored as high in of 90 lymph nodes (26%). The molecular-positive lymph nodes lead to the restaging of 37 (62%) pN0 patients as molecular N1 or N2 and 5 (31%) pN1 cases were reclassified as molecular-positive N2. Surprisingly, molecular-positive patients associated with a better OS (overall survival, p = 0,04). FGFR2b overexpression was observed in 41 (12%) lymph nodes leading to the restaging of 17 patients (22%). Again a trend was observed toward a better DFS (disease-free survival) in the restaged patients (p = 0,09). Accordingly, high expression levels of CEACAM5 or FGFR2b in the primary were related to better DFS (p = 0,06; p < 0,02, respectively).
Conclusion: Molecular nodal restaging based on expression levels of CEACAM5 and/or FGFR2b, does not add relevant clinical information to pathological staging of NSCLC likely related to the better prognosis of their overexpression in primary tumors.
Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer; Lung development; molecular marker; nodal staging.
Similar articles
-
Expression of molecular markers in mediastinal nodes from resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): prognostic impact and potential role as markers of occult micrometastases.Ann Oncol. 2009 Jan;20(1):91-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn538. Epub 2008 Jul 29. Ann Oncol. 2009. PMID: 18664559
-
Association of Pathologic Nodal Staging Quality With Survival Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Resection With Curative Intent.JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):80-87. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2993. JAMA Oncol. 2018. PMID: 28973110 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of lymph node lung cancer micrometastasis using carcinoembryonic antigen marker.Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1539-44. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1539. Chest. 2005. PMID: 16162755
-
The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming 8th Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Dec;10(12):1675-84. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000678. J Thorac Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26709477 Review.
-
A Comprehensive Comparison of Different Nodal Subclassification Methods in Surgically Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8144-8153. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12363-w. Epub 2022 Aug 18. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35980551 Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic significance of SHP2 (PTPN11) expression in solid tumors: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262931. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35061863 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous