Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;12(1 Suppl):31-39.
doi: 10.1177/1758573219826341. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

Medium to long-term results of a recessed glenoid for glenoid resurfacing in total shoulder arthroplasty

Affiliations

Medium to long-term results of a recessed glenoid for glenoid resurfacing in total shoulder arthroplasty

Mark Ross et al. Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Recessed mini-glenoid components provide an alternative to total shoulder replacement that may avoid some of the known shortcomings and complications associated with shoulder hemiarthroplasty or standard glenoid components in difficult cases. This study reports survivorship, radiological and clinical outcomes of a recessed mini-glenoid implant in a consecutive cohort.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study reporting outcomes of 28 consecutive shoulders (27 patients) following total shoulder replacement using a recessed, cemented mini-glenoid implant at two sites.

Results: The most frequent diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis (79%); glenoid morphology was Walch Type A (67%), B1 15%, B2 10% and C 10%. At final follow-up, pain was 16.3 (SD = 23.1), American Shoulder and Elbow Score was 64.5 (SD = 31.9) and (normalized) Constant score was 83.0 (SD = 20.7). Implant survivorship at average final follow-up of seven years (3-13) was 96.4%. Seven mini-glenoids showed small peripheral radiolucent lines at one-year X-ray follow-up but were non-progressive on subsequent imaging.

Discussion: Recessed polyethylene mini-glenoid is an attractive alternative for shoulder arthroplasty and provides an intermediate solution between standard glenoid components and hemiarthroplasty. Our medium to long-term results demonstrate reliable clinical outcomes, absence of glenoid erosion, low complication rate and satisfactory implant survivorship.

Keywords: custom implant; glenoid; osteoarthritis; recessed; shoulder arthroplasty; shoulder replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Prototype implant as utilized in this study cohort between 2001 and 2010. (b) Technical drawing of the recessed glenoid implant.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER) measures at baseline (pre-op) and last follow-up. (b) Patient-reported Global Rating of Change score for symptoms and function.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Ten-year radiographs after implantation in Type A centred arthritis.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A 56-year-old male, bilateral dysplastic glenoids, bilateral recessed glenoids. Right implant positioned in only available bone stock at base of coracoid, flat glenoid reamed to concavity centred on implant location.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Seven-year clinical follow-up bilateral recessed glenoids in glenoid hypoplasia with retroversion.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Example of recessed mini-glenoid with humeral resurfacing.

References

    1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/ (accessed 30 April 2018).
    1. Edwards TB, Kadakia NR, Boulahia A, et al. A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12: 207–213. - PubMed
    1. Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 26–34. - PubMed
    1. Radnay CS, Setter KJ, Chambers L, et al. Total shoulder replacement compared with humeral head replacement for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 396–402. - PubMed
    1. Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, et al. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1947–1956. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources