Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 8:11:2040620720966121.
doi: 10.1177/2040620720966121. eCollection 2020.

Serum ferritin and ECOG performance status predict the response and improve the prognostic value of IPSS or IPSS-R in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia treated with 5-azacytidine: a retrospective analysis of the Hellenic national registry of myelodysplastic and hypoplastic syndromes

Affiliations

Serum ferritin and ECOG performance status predict the response and improve the prognostic value of IPSS or IPSS-R in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia treated with 5-azacytidine: a retrospective analysis of the Hellenic national registry of myelodysplastic and hypoplastic syndromes

Sotirios G Papageorgiou et al. Ther Adv Hematol. .

Abstract

Background: 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) improves survival of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, predictive factors for response and outcome have not been consistently studied.

Methods: This study of the Hellenic MDS Study Group included 687 consecutive patients with higher-risk MDS and oligoblastic AML treated with 5-AZA.

Results: The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) revised version (IPSS-R), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (0 or 1 versus ⩾2) and baseline serum ferritin (SF) levels > 520 ng/ml were shown to independently predict response to 5-AZA. In the survival analysis, the IPSS and IPSS-R risk classification systems along with the ECOG PS and SF levels > 520 ng/ml proved to be independent prognosticators for overall survival (OS), as well as for leukemia-free survival (LFS). Next, we built new multivariate models for OS and LFS, incorporating only ECOG PS and SF levels besides IPSS or IPSS-R risk classification systems. Thereby, the new modified IPSS and IPSS-R risk classification systems (H-PSS, H-PSS-R) could each discriminate a low, an intermediate and a high-risk patient group regarding OS and LFS. The H-PSS and H-PSS-R proved to be better predictors of OS than their previous counterparts as well as the French prognostic score, while the most powerful OS predictor was the new, H-PSS-R system.

Conclusions: ECOG PS and SF levels > 520 ng/ml independently predict response to 5-AZA, OS and LFS. Their incorporation in the IPSS and IPSS-R scores enhances these scores' predictive power in 5-AZA-treated higher-risk MDS and oligoblastic AML patients.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; outcome; prognosis; risk classification system; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier OS and LFS curves, showing the prognostic significance of ECOG PS and SF levels in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic AML, treated with 5-azacytidine. Poor ECOG PS (⩾2) and high SF levels (⩾520 ng/ml) predict unfavorable [(a) and (b), respectively] and inferior LFS [(c) and (d), respectively]. Total number of patients of each cohort and number of events are shown. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; LFS, leukemia-free survival; OS, overall survival; SF, serum ferritin.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves, showing the prognostic significance of H-PSS and H-PSS-R risk classification systems in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic AML, treated with 5-azacytidine. Both H-PSS and H-PSS-R have very high prognostic significance, with regard to OS [(a) and (b), respectively] and LFS [(c) and (d), respectively]. Total number of patients of each cohort and number of events are shown. AML, acute myeloid leukemia; H-PSS, modified International Prognostic Scoring System risk classification system; H-PSS-R, modified International Prognostic Scoring System (revised) risk classification system; LFS, leukemia-free survival; OS, overall survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Montalban-Bravo G, Garcia-Manero G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. Am J Hematol 2018; 93: 129–147. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 1997; 89: 2079–2088. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2012; 120: 2454–2465. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lamarque M, Raynaud S, Itzykson R, et al. The revised IPSS is a powerful tool to evaluate the outcome of MDS patients treated with azacitidine: the GFM experience. Blood 2012; 120: 5084–5085. - PubMed
    1. Neukirchen J, Lauseker M, Blum S, et al. Validation of the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter study. Leuk Res 2014; 38: 57–64. - PubMed