Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 2:7:551861.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.551861. eCollection 2020.

Intravascular Ultrasound in the Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Current Role and Future Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Intravascular Ultrasound in the Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Current Role and Future Perspectives

Romaric Loffroy et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Over the last decade, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has emerged as a useful adjunctive tool to angiography in an increasing number of catheter-based procedures for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). IVUS catheters offer accurate cross-sectional imaging of arterial vessels with high dimensional accuracy and provide accurate information about lesion morphology. IVUS enables assessment of the plaque morphology, vessel diameter, and the presence of arterial dissections. Furthermore, IVUS is able to properly guide the best choice of appropriate percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) technique, guide the delivery of different devices, and assess the immediate result of any endovascular intervention. In the present review, the role of IVUS for PAD will be discussed, specifically the applications of IVUS technology during interventional procedures including PTA, stent sizing, crossing total occlusion, assessing residual narrowing and stent apposition and expansion, and atherectomy. Future perspectives of IVUS-guided treatments and cost-effectiveness of the systematic use of IVUS during endovascular interventions will be also discussed.

Keywords: atherectomy; intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); peripheral arterial disease; stent placement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Commonly used peripheral vascular intravascular ultrasound catheter. It comes on a 0.014- or 0.035-inch guidewire with monorail system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Limping patient of 67-year old. (a) Antegrade angiography by common femoral approach shows pre-occlusive calcified stenotic lesion of the mid and distal part of the right superficial femoral artery. (b) Atherectomy with the Phoenix device. (c) Control after atherectomy shows lumen gain. (d) Control after conventional PTA demonstrates no residual stenosis. (e) Result after application of drug-coated balloon shows no significant focal residual stenosis (arrow). (f) Checking with a 0.014-inch IVUS catheter. (g–i) IVUS demonstrates very well a focal intimal dissection post-angioplasty at the level of the focal residual stenosis, not visible at angiogram (arrows). (j–l) Result after spot stenting. (m,n) Final IVUS control shows normal arterial lumen with stent patency.
Figure 3
Figure 3
72-year old patient with right claudication. (a) Angiogram by crossover shows important calcified stenotic lesions of the right common femoral artery (arrow). (b,c) IVUS confirms the large circonferential hyperechogenic calcifications (arrows). (d) Use of JetStream atherectomy device for debulking. (e) Result after debulking shows lumen gain. (f) Conventional PTA and drug-coated balloon angioplasty. (g) IVUS control confirms the excellent debulking result with removal of calcifications and lumen gain. No additional stenting was needed. (h) Final result at angiogram demonstrates normal lumen size with no residual stenosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Diethrich EB, Irshad K, Reid DB. Virtual histology and color flow intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions. Semin Vasc Surg. (2006) 19:155–62. 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2006.06.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duran C, Bismuth J. Advanced imaging in limb salvage. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. (2012) 8:28–32. 10.14797/mdcj-8-4-28 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakatani S, Proniewska K, Pociask E, Paoletti G, de Winter S, Muramatsu T, et al. . How clinically effective is intravascular ultrasound in interventional cardiology? Present and future perspectives. Exp Rev Med Devices. (2013) 10:735–49. 10.1586/17434440.2013.841353 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arthurs ZM, Bishop PD, Feiten LE, Eagleton MJ, Clair DG, Kashyap VS. Evaluation of peripheral atherosclerosis: a comparative analysis of angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. (2010) 51:933–9. 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JT, Fang TD, White RA. Applications of intravascular ultrasound in the treatment of peripheral occlusive disease. Semin Vasc Surg. (2006) 19:139–44. 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2006.06.004 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources