Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 6:2:102.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00102. eCollection 2020.

Men's and Women's World Championship Marathon Performances and Changes With Fatigue Are Not Explained by Kinematic Differences Between Footstrike Patterns

Affiliations

Men's and Women's World Championship Marathon Performances and Changes With Fatigue Are Not Explained by Kinematic Differences Between Footstrike Patterns

Brian Hanley et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

World-class marathon runners make initial contact with the rearfoot, midfoot or forefoot. This novel study analyzed kinematic similarities and differences between rearfoot and non-rearfoot strikers within the men's and women's 2017 IAAF World Championship marathons across the last two laps. Twenty-eight men and 28 women, equally divided by footstrike pattern, were recorded at 29.5 and 40 km (laps 3 and 4, respectively) using two high-definition cameras (50 Hz). The videos were digitized to derive spatiotemporal and joint kinematic data, with additional footage (120 Hz) used to identify footstrike patterns. There was no difference in running speed, step length or cadence between rearfoot and non-rearfoot strikers during either lap in both races, and these three key variables decreased in athletes of either footstrike pattern to a similar extent between laps. Men slowed more than women between laps, and overall had greater reductions in step length and cadence. Rearfoot strikers landed with their foot farther in front of the center of mass (by 0.02-0.04 m), with non-rearfoot strikers relying more on flight distance for overall step length. Male rearfoot strikers had more extended knees, dorsiflexed ankles and hyperextended shoulders at initial contact than non-rearfoot strikers, whereas female rearfoot strikers had more flexed hips and extended knees at initial contact. Very few differences were found at midstance and toe-off. Rearfoot and non-rearfoot striking techniques were therefore mostly indistinguishable except at initial contact, and any differences that did occur were very small. The spatiotemporal variables that differed between footstrike patterns were not associated with faster running speeds and, ultimately, neither footstrike pattern prevented reductions in running speeds. The only joint angle measured at a specific gait event to change with fatigue was midswing knee flexion angle in men. Coaches should thus note that encouraging marathon runners to convert from rearfoot to non-rearfoot striking is unlikely to provide any performance benefits, and that training the fatigue resistance of key lower limb muscle-tendon units to avoid decreases in step length and cadence are more useful in preventing reductions in speed during the later stages of the race.

Keywords: athletics; endurance; performance; running; videography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Knee angle during one complete gait cycle for RFS and NRFS in both men's and women's races during lap 3. Results are shown as means, with SD not indicated for any group for clarity (means and SDs are shown in Tables 47 for knee angles at initial contact, midstance, toe-off and midswing, respectively). The vertical lines represent the mean initial contact times (as a percentage of the gait cycle) for each group indicated.

References

    1. Abdel-Aziz Y. I., Karara H. M., Hauck M. (2015). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into space coordinates in close range photogrammetry. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 81, 103–107. 10.14358/PERS.81.2.103 - DOI
    1. Abshire D., Metzler B. (2010). Natural Running: The Simple Path to Stronger, Healthier Running. Boulder, CO: Velo Press.
    1. Almeida M. O., Davis I. S., Lopes A. D. (2015). Biomechanical differences of foot-strike patterns during running: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 45, 738–755. 10.2519/jospt.2015.6019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson O. (2018). Running form: How to Run Faster and Prevent Injury. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    1. Ardigò L. P, LaFortuna C., Minetti A. E, Mognoni P., Saibene F. (1995). Metabolic and mechanical aspects of foot landing type, forefoot and rearfoot strike, in human running. Acta Physiol. Scand. 155, 17–22. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1995.tb09943.x - DOI - PubMed