Psychometric evaluation of a newly developed measure of emotionalism after stroke (TEARS-Q)
- PMID: 33345598
- PMCID: PMC8191157
- DOI: 10.1177/0269215520981727
Psychometric evaluation of a newly developed measure of emotionalism after stroke (TEARS-Q)
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate, psychometrically, a new measure of tearful emotionalism following stroke: Testing Emotionalism After Recent Stroke - Questionnaire (TEARS-Q).
Setting: Acute stroke units based in nine Scottish hospitals, in the context of a longitudinal cohort study of post-stroke emotionalism.
Subjects: A total of 224 clinically diagnosed stroke survivors recruited between October 1st 2015 and September 30th 2018, within 2 weeks of their stroke.
Measures: The measure was the self-report questionnaire TEARS-Q, constructed based on post-stroke tearful emotionalism diagnostic criteria: (i) increased tearfulness, (ii) crying comes on suddenly, with no warning (iii) crying not under usual social control and (iv) crying episodes occur at least once weekly. The reference standard was presence/absence of emotionalism on a diagnostic, semi-structured post-stroke emotionalism interview, administered at the same assessment point. Stroke, mood, cognition and functional outcome measures were also completed by the subjects.
Results: A total of 97 subjects were female, with a mean age 65.1 years. 205 subjects had sustained ischaemic stroke. 61 subjects were classified as mild stroke. TEARS-Q was internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha 0.87). TEARS-Q scores readily discriminated the two groups, with a mean difference of -7.18, 95% CI (-8.07 to -6.29). A cut off score of 2 on TEARS-Q correctly identified 53 of the 61 stroke survivors with tearful emotionalism and 140 of the 156 stroke survivors without tearful emotionalism. One factor accounted for 57% of the item response variance, and all eight TEARS-Q items acceptably discriminated underlying emotionalism.
Conclusion: TEARS-Q accurately diagnoses tearful emotionalism after stroke.
Keywords: Stroke; emotionalism; mental health.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Woodward TJ, Kim C, Calderon F, et al.. Review of the diagnosis and management of pseudobulbar affect. US Pharm 2017; 42: 31–35.
-
- Gillespie DC, Cadden AP, Lees R, et al.. Prevalence of post-stroke pseudobulbar affect following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25: 688–694. - PubMed
-
- George S, Wilcock AA, Stanley M. Depression and lability: the effects on occupation following stroke. Br J Occup Ther 2001; 64: 455–461.
