Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Apr;232(4):373-378.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Marissa Howard-McNatt et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: We examined the impact of cavity shave margins (CSMs) on margin status in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing partial mastectomy (PM).

Methods: One hundred and nine patients from 2 multicenter, randomized controlled trials were identified with pure DCIS (no invasive cancer). Surgeons performed their best PM, with specimen radiography and resection of selective margins per surgeon discretion. Patients were then randomized to have CSM resected or not. A positive margin was defined as <2 mm from ink.

Results: Median patient age was 63 years; median size of DCIS was 1.20 cm; 43.6% of patients had high-grade DCIS; and 58 (53.2%) patients were randomized to take CSM. The "shave" and "no-shave" groups were well-matched for age, race, ethnicity, palpability, grade, and size of DCIS. Although 33 (56.9%) of the patients in the shave group had a positive margin before randomization, only 12 (20.7%) had a positive margin after randomization to CSM (p < 0.001). In the no-shave group, 17 patients (33.3%) had a positive margin. Controlling for size and grade of DCIS, taking CSM resulted in a nearly 65% reduction in the positive-margin rate (odds ratio 0.366; 95% CI, 0.136 to 0.981; p = 0.046). Size of DCIS remained an independent predictor of positive margins in the model (odds ratio 1.646; 95% CI, 1.227 to 2.209; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: CSM reduces positive-margin rates in patients with pure DCIS, and can be a practical solution for DCIS patients who tend to have a high rate of margin positivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Invited Commentary.
    Hunt KK. Hunt KK. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):378-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.031. J Am Coll Surg. 2021. PMID: 33771294 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms