Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;39(6):306-311.
doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000687.

Evaluation of Electronic Health Record-Generated Work Intensity Scores and Nurse Perceptions of Workload Appropriateness

Affiliations

Evaluation of Electronic Health Record-Generated Work Intensity Scores and Nurse Perceptions of Workload Appropriateness

Dana Womack et al. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Electronic health record-generated work intensity scores represent state-of-the art functionality for dynamic nursing workload estimation in the hospital setting. In contrast to traditional stand-alone patient classification and acuity tools, electronic health record-based tools eliminate the need for dedicated data entry, and scores are automatically updated as new information is entered into patient records. This paper summarizes the method and results of evaluation of electronic health record-generated work intensity scores on six hospital patient care units in a single academic medical center. The correlation between beginning-of-shift work intensity scores and self-reported registered nurse rating of appropriateness of patient assignment was assessed using Spearman rank correlation. A weak negative correlation (-0.09 to -0.23) was observed on all study units, indicating that nurse appropriateness ratings decrease as work intensity scores increase. Electronic health record-generated work intensity scores provide useful information that can augment existing data sources used by charge nurses to create equitable nurse-patient assignments. Additional research is needed to explain observed variation in nurses' appropriateness ratings across similar work intensity point ranges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Work intensity scores by RN workload appropriateness rating and patient care unit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalisch BJ, Tschannen D, Lee H, Friese CR. Hospital variation in missed nursing care. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2011;26(4): 291–299. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho SH. Effects of increasing nurse staffing on missed nursing care. International Nursing Review. 2015;62(2): 267–274. - PubMed
    1. Baethge A, Müller A, Rigotti T. Nursing performance under high workload: a diary study on the moderating role of selection, optimization and compensation strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016;72(3): 545–557. - PubMed
    1. Bagshaw SM, Opgenorth D, Potestio M, et al. Healthcare provider perceptions of causes and consequences of ICU capacity strain in a large publicly funded integrated health region: a qualitative study. Critical Care Medicine. 2017;45(4): e347–e356. - PubMed
    1. Gaffney TA. Enhancing patient safety: factors influencing medical error recovery among medical-surgical nurses. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2016;21(3). - PubMed