Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 1;29(1):3-16.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00145.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Review of Our Biomechanical Evidence

Affiliations
Review

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Review of Our Biomechanical Evidence

Song Ho Chang et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. .

Abstract

Definitive diagnosis and optimal surgical treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability remains controversial. This review distills available biomechanical evidence as it pertains to the clinical assessment, imaging work up, and surgical treatment of lateral ankle instability. Current data suggest that accurate assessment of ligament integrity during physical examination requires the ankle to ideally be held in 16° of plantar flexion when performing the anterior drawer test and 18° of dorsiflexion when performing the talar tilt test, respectively. Stress radiographs are limited by their low sensitivity, and MRI is limited by its static nature. Surgically, both arthroscopic and open repair techniques appear biomechanically equivalent in their ability to restore ankle stability, although sufficient evidence is still lacking for any particular procedure to be considered a superior construct. When performing reconstruction, grafts should be tensioned at 10 N and use of nonabsorbable augmentations lacking viscoelastic creep must factor in the potential for overtensioning. Anatomic lateral ligament surgery provides sufficient biomechanical strength to safely enable immediate postoperative weight bearing if lateral ankle stress is neutralized with a boot. Further research and comparative clinical trials will be necessary to define which of these ever-increasing procedural options actually optimizes patient outcome for chronic lateral ankle instability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Behrens SB, Drakos M, Lee BJ, et al.: Biomechanical analysis of Brostrom versus Brostrom-Gould lateral ankle instability repairs. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34:587-592.
    1. Brattstrom H: Tenodesis employing the method of Watson-Jones for the treatment of recurrent subluxation of the ankle. Acta Orthop Scand 1953;23:132-136.
    1. Brostrom L: Sprained ankles. VI. Surgical treatment of “chronic” ligament ruptures. Acta Chir Scand 1966;132:551-565.
    1. Chrisman OD, Snook GA: Reconstruction of lateral ligament tears of the ankle. An experimental study and clinical evaluation of seven patients treated by a new modification of the Elmslie procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:904-912.
    1. Gould N, Seligson D, Gassman J: Early and late repair of lateral ligament of the ankle. Foot Ankle 1980;1:84-89.

LinkOut - more resources