Power, policy and abortion care in Uganda
- PMID: 33347559
- PMCID: PMC7996642
- DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa136
Power, policy and abortion care in Uganda
Abstract
Unsafe abortion practices remain the major contributor to maternal death in Uganda, impeding the achievement of universal health coverage and quality of maternal health care. Using an ethnographic design and critical discourse analysis, we explored the operations of power in setting maternal healthcare priorities, as evident at the 2018 Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Adolescents Health Conference. Observational data were collected of the policy-making activities, processes and events and key informant interviews were conducted with 27 participants. We describe how neoliberal and state governance through the structure and organization of policy-making, epistemic governance and universal concepts of 'high-impact' interventions, results-based financing, cost-effectiveness and accountability converge to suppress the articulation of local conditions associated with unsafe and risky abortion. By defining maternity along the continuum of birth and emphasizing birthing women, priority-setting was directed towards interventions promoting women's normative role as mothers while suppressing unmet abortion care needs. Finally, discursive and communicative materials controlled how women of reproductive age in Uganda managed reproduction.
Keywords: Uganda; abortion care; communicative material; discursive practice; epistemic governance; governmentality; prioritization.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
References
-
- Aantjes CJ, Gilmoor A, Syurina EV, Crankshaw TL.. 2018. The status of provision of post abortion care services for women and girls in Eastern and Southern Africa: a systematic review. Contraception 98: 77–88. - PubMed
-
- Alasuutari P, Qadir A.. 2014. Epistemic governance: an approach to the politics of policy making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1: 67–84.
-
- Béhague D, Storeng K.. 2013. Pragmatic politics and epistemological diversity: the contested and authoritative uses of historical evidence in the Safe Motherhood Initiative. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 9: 65–85.
-
- Bisaillon L, Rankin JM.. 2013. Navigating the politics of fieldwork using Institutional Ethnography: strategies for practice. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14: 1–27.
-
- CEHURD. 2016. Facing Uganda’s Law on Abortion Experiences from Women & Service Providers .Kampala: Centre for Health, Human Rights and Development.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
