Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 26;36(2):187-195.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa136.

Power, policy and abortion care in Uganda

Affiliations

Power, policy and abortion care in Uganda

Alexander Kagaha et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

Unsafe abortion practices remain the major contributor to maternal death in Uganda, impeding the achievement of universal health coverage and quality of maternal health care. Using an ethnographic design and critical discourse analysis, we explored the operations of power in setting maternal healthcare priorities, as evident at the 2018 Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Adolescents Health Conference. Observational data were collected of the policy-making activities, processes and events and key informant interviews were conducted with 27 participants. We describe how neoliberal and state governance through the structure and organization of policy-making, epistemic governance and universal concepts of 'high-impact' interventions, results-based financing, cost-effectiveness and accountability converge to suppress the articulation of local conditions associated with unsafe and risky abortion. By defining maternity along the continuum of birth and emphasizing birthing women, priority-setting was directed towards interventions promoting women's normative role as mothers while suppressing unmet abortion care needs. Finally, discursive and communicative materials controlled how women of reproductive age in Uganda managed reproduction.

Keywords: Uganda; abortion care; communicative material; discursive practice; epistemic governance; governmentality; prioritization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aantjes CJ, Gilmoor A, Syurina EV, Crankshaw TL.. 2018. The status of provision of post abortion care services for women and girls in Eastern and Southern Africa: a systematic review. Contraception 98: 77–88. - PubMed
    1. Alasuutari P, Qadir A.. 2014. Epistemic governance: an approach to the politics of policy making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1: 67–84.
    1. Béhague D, Storeng K.. 2013. Pragmatic politics and epistemological diversity: the contested and authoritative uses of historical evidence in the Safe Motherhood Initiative. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 9: 65–85.
    1. Bisaillon L, Rankin JM.. 2013. Navigating the politics of fieldwork using Institutional Ethnography: strategies for practice. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14: 1–27.
    1. CEHURD. 2016. Facing Uganda’s Law on Abortion Experiences from Women & Service Providers .Kampala: Centre for Health, Human Rights and Development.