The impact of active or passive food preparation versus distraction on eating behaviour: An experimental study
- PMID: 33347874
- DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105072
The impact of active or passive food preparation versus distraction on eating behaviour: An experimental study
Abstract
Research indicates a role for attention in the perception of hunger and food intake. The present experimental study aimed to explore the impact of attention to food cues through either active or passive food preparation, versus attention away from food cues through a non-food distraction task on eating behaviour using a preload/taste test design. Female participants (n = 80) were randomly allocated to one of four conditions: active food preparation (making a wrap); passive video preparation (watching video of researcher making a wrap); distraction (a non-food colouring task); no time control. Measures of desire to eat (hunger, fullness, motivation) were taken before and after the interventions. Food intake was measured in terms of mass of wrap consumed and snacks consumed at a subsequent taste test. The results showed greater wrap consumption for active and passive food preparation and the control groups compared to the distraction intervention. Further, the results showed that active food preparation resulted in increased hunger and motivation to eat and that passive food preparation resulted in increased motivation to eat. No changes were found following distraction. To conclude, attention to food cues through both active and passive food preparation can increase both food intake and the desire to eat. The implications for promoting changes in eating behaviour are discussed.
Keywords: Attention; Cooking; Distraction; Eating behaviour; Food preparation; Hunger.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Distraction, the desire to eat and food intake. Towards an expanded model of mindless eating.Appetite. 2013 Mar;62:119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.023. Epub 2012 Dec 5. Appetite. 2013. PMID: 23219989 Clinical Trial.
-
Food reward. What it is and how to measure it.Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.032. Epub 2015 Feb 26. Appetite. 2015. PMID: 25728883
-
Distraction, restrained eating and disinhibition: An experimental study of food intake and the impact of 'eating on the go'.J Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;22(1):39-50. doi: 10.1177/1359105315595119. Epub 2016 Jul 10. J Health Psychol. 2017. PMID: 26296575
-
[Assessing various aspects of the motivation to eat that can affect food intake and body weight control].Encephale. 2009 Apr;35(2):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Jul 7. Encephale. 2009. PMID: 19393389 Review. French.
-
Forebrain networks and the control of feeding by environmental learned cues.Physiol Behav. 2013 Sep 10;121:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 Apr 3. Physiol Behav. 2013. PMID: 23562305 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources