Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):2415.
doi: 10.3390/ani10122415.

Reducing versus Embracing Variation as Strategies for Reproducibility: The Microbiome of Laboratory Mice

Affiliations
Review

Reducing versus Embracing Variation as Strategies for Reproducibility: The Microbiome of Laboratory Mice

Vera M Witjes et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Irreproducibility is a well-recognized problem in biomedical animal experimentation. Phenotypic variation in animal models is one of the many challenging causes of irreproducibility. How to deal with phenotypic variation in experimental designs is a topic of debate. Both reducing and embracing variation are highlighted as strategies for reproducibility. In this theoretical review, we use variation in mouse microbiome composition as an example to analyze this ongoing discussion, drawing on both animal research and philosophy of science. We provide a conceptual explanation of reproducibility and analyze how the microbiome affects mouse phenotypes to demonstrate that the role of the microbiome in irreproducibility can be understood in two ways: (i) the microbiome can act as a confounding factor, and (ii) the result may not be generalizable to mice harboring a different microbiome composition. We elucidate that reducing variation minimizes confounding, whereas embracing variation ensures generalizability. These contrasting strategies make dealing with variation in experimental designs extremely complex. Here, we conclude that the most effective strategy depends on the specific research aim and question. The field of biomedical animal experimentation is too broad to identify a single optimal strategy. Thus, dealing with variation should be considered on a case-by-case basis, and awareness amongst researchers is essential.

Keywords: animal experiments; mouse microbiomes; reproducibility; variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Complex interactions between environment, mouse genotype and mouse microbiome might affect mouse phenotype.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparisons between wild-type and knockout mice are at risk of bias due to differences in microbiome composition resulting from separate breeding.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variation in mouse microbiome composition can explain irreproducibility between (and also within) facilities as the effectiveness of a treatment might be specific to a certain microbiome composition and not generalizable to mice harboring different microbes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Littermate-controlled experiments and cohousing to standardize mouse microbiome composition within an experiment to avoid confounding.

References

    1. KNAW . Replication Studies—Improving Reproducibility in the Empirical Sciences. KNAW; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2018. p. 66.
    1. Baker M. 1500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533:452–454. doi: 10.1038/533452a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romero F. Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis. Philos. Compass. 2019;14:e12633. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12633. - DOI
    1. Kafkafi N., Agassi J., Chesler E.J., Crabbe J.C., Crusio W.E., Eilam D., Gerlai R., Golani I., Gomez-Marin A., Heller R., et al. Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018;87:218–232. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheleuitte-Nieves C., Lipman N.S. Improving Replicability, Reproducibility, and Reliability in Preclinical Research: A Shared Responsibility. ILAR J. 2020 doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilaa022. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources