Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 17;9(12):1883.
doi: 10.3390/foods9121883.

Strategies to Improve Meat Products' Quality

Affiliations
Review

Strategies to Improve Meat Products' Quality

Claudiu Ștefan Ursachi et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Meat products represent an important component of the human diet, their consumption registering a global increase over the last few years. These foodstuffs constitute a good source of energy and some nutrients, such as essential amino acids, high biological value proteins, minerals like iron, zinc, selenium, manganese and B-complex vitamins, especially vitamin B12. On the other hand, nutritionists have associated high consumption of processed meat with an increased risk of several diseases. Researchers and processed meat producers are involved in finding methods to eliminate nutritional deficiencies and potentially toxic compounds, to obtain healthier products and at the same time with no affecting the sensorial quality and safety of the meat products. The present review aims to summarize the newest trends regarding the most important methods that can be applied to obtain high-quality products. Nutritional enrichment with natural bioactive plant compounds (antioxidants, dietary fibers) or probiotics, reduction of harmful components (salt, nitrate/nitrite, N-nitrosamines) and the use of alternative technologies (high-pressure processing, cold plasma, ultrasounds) are the most used current strategies to accomplish this aim.

Keywords: antioxidants; dietary fibers; meat products quality; probiotics; processing technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed strategies for improving the quality of meat products.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Commission Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. J. Eur. Union. 2004;139:55–205.
    1. Simonin H., Duranton F., de Lamballerie M. New Insights into the High-Pressure Processing of Meat and Meat Products. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012;11:285–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00184.x. - DOI
    1. Higgs J.D. The changing nature of red meat: 20 years of improving nutritional quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2000;11:85–95. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00055-8. - DOI
    1. Jiang J., Xiong Y.L. Natural antioxidants as food and feed additives to promote health benefits and quality of meat products: A review. Meat Sci. 2016;120:107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pereira P.M., Vicente A.F. Meat nutritional composition and nutritive role in the human diet. Meat Sci. 2013;93:586–592. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.09.018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources