The budding yeast transition to quiescence
- PMID: 33350501
- DOI: 10.1002/yea.3546
The budding yeast transition to quiescence
Abstract
A subset of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in a stationary phase culture achieve a unique quiescent state characterized by increased cell density, stress tolerance, and longevity. Trehalose accumulation is necessary but not sufficient for conferring this state, and it is not recapitulated by abrupt starvation. The fraction of cells that achieve this state varies widely in haploids and diploids and can approach 100%, indicating that both mother and daughter cells can enter quiescence. The transition begins when about half the glucose has been taken up from the medium. The high affinity glucose transporters are turned on, glycogen storage begins, the Rim15 kinase enters the nucleus and the accumulation of cells in G1 is initiated. After the diauxic shift (DS), when glucose is exhausted from the medium, growth promoting genes are repressed by the recruitment of the histone deacetylase Rpd3 by quiescence-specific repressors. The final division that takes place post-DS is highly asymmetrical and G1 arrest is complete after 48 h. The timing of these events can vary considerably, but they are tightly correlated with total biomass of the culture, suggesting that the transition to quiescence is tightly linked to changes in external glucose levels. After 7 days in culture, there are massive morphological changes at the protein and organelle level. There are global changes in histone modification. An extensive array of condensin-dependent, long-range chromatin interactions lead to genome-wide chromatin compaction that is conserved in yeast and human cells. These interactions are required for the global transcriptional repression that occurs in quiescent yeast.
Keywords: G1 arrest; Msa1; Msa2; Rpd3; Xbp1; chromatin compaction; histone modification.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Msa1 and Msa2 Modulate G1-Specific Transcription to Promote G1 Arrest and the Transition to Quiescence in Budding Yeast.PLoS Genet. 2016 Jun 6;12(6):e1006088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006088. eCollection 2016 Jun. PLoS Genet. 2016. PMID: 27272642 Free PMC article.
-
Condensin-Dependent Chromatin Compaction Represses Transcription Globally during Quiescence.Mol Cell. 2019 Feb 7;73(3):533-546.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Dec 27. Mol Cell. 2019. PMID: 30595435 Free PMC article.
-
Unraveling quiescence-specific repressive chromatin domains.Curr Genet. 2019 Oct;65(5):1145-1151. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-00985-9. Epub 2019 May 4. Curr Genet. 2019. PMID: 31055637 Review.
-
A common strategy for initiating the transition from proliferation to quiescence.Curr Genet. 2017 May;63(2):179-186. doi: 10.1007/s00294-016-0640-0. Epub 2016 Aug 20. Curr Genet. 2017. PMID: 27544284 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Xbp1 directs global repression of budding yeast transcription during the transition to quiescence and is important for the longevity and reversibility of the quiescent state.PLoS Genet. 2013 Oct;9(10):e1003854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003854. Epub 2013 Oct 31. PLoS Genet. 2013. PMID: 24204289 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Microfluidic Platform for Tracking Individual Cell Dynamics during an Unperturbed Nutrients Exhaustion.Bio Protoc. 2022 Jul 20;12(14):e4470. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4470. eCollection 2022 Jul 20. Bio Protoc. 2022. PMID: 35978570 Free PMC article.
-
The TOP-2/condensin II axis silences transcription during germline specification in C. elegans.G3 (Bethesda). 2024 Oct 3;14(12):jkae236. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae236. Online ahead of print. G3 (Bethesda). 2024. PMID: 39358855 Free PMC article.
-
Is There a Histone Code for Cellular Quiescence?Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Oct 29;9:739780. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.739780. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34778253 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Into the wild-Exploring the life cycles of yeasts.Yeast. 2021 Jan;38(1):3-4. doi: 10.1002/yea.3547. Yeast. 2021. PMID: 33565640 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
G0 arrest gene patterns to predict the prognosis and drug sensitivity of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0309076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309076. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39159158 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aguilaniu, H., Gustafsson, L., Rigoulet, M., & Nystrom, T. (2003). Asymmetric inheritance of oxidatively damaged proteins during cytokinesis. Science, 299, 1751-1753. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080418
-
- Allen, C., Buttner, S., Aragon, A. D., Thomas, J. A., Meirelles, O., Jaetao, J. E., … Werner-Washburne, M. (2006). Isolation of quiescent and nonquiescent cells from yeast stationary-phase cultures. The Journal of Cell Biology, 174, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200604072
-
- Alvers, A. L., Fishwick, L. K., Wood, M. S., Hu, D., Chung, H. S., Dunn, W. A. Jr., & Aris, J. P. (2009). Autophagy and amino acid homeostasis are required for chronological longevity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Aging Cell, 8, 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00469.x
-
- Ashe, M., de Bruin, R. A., Kalashnikova, T., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R. 3rd, & Wittenberg, C. (2008). The SBF- and MBF-associated protein Msa1 is required for proper timing of G1-specific transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283, 6040-6049. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M708248200
-
- Boer, V. M., Amini, S., & Botstein, D. (2008). Influence of genotype and nutrition on survival and metabolism of starving yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 6930-6935. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802601105
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases