Treating patients across European Union borders: An international survey in light of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic
- PMID: 33350712
- PMCID: PMC7969157
- DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001423
Treating patients across European Union borders: An international survey in light of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic
Abstract
Background: In light of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, how resources are managed and the critically ill are allocated must be reviewed. Although ethical recommendations have been published, strategies for dealing with overcapacity of critical care resources have so far not been addressed.
Objectives: Assess expert opinion for allocation preferences regarding the growing imbalance between supply and demand for medical resources.
Design: A 10-item questionnaire was developed and sent to the most prominent members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC).
Setting: Survey via a web-based platform.
Patients: Respondents were members of the National Anaesthesiologists Societies Committee and Council Members of the ESAIC; 74 of 80 (92.5%), responded to the survey.
Measurements and main results: Responses were analysed thematically. The majority of respondents (83.8%), indicated that resources for COVID-19 were available at the time of the survey. Of the representatives of the ESAIC governing bodies, 58.9% favoured an allocation of excess critical care capacity: 69% wished to make them available to supraregional patients, whereas 30.9% preferred to keep the resources available for the local population. Regarding the type of distribution of resources, 35.3% preferred to make critical care available, 32.4% favoured the allocation of medical equipment and 32.4% wished to support both options. The majority (59.5%) supported the implementation of a central European institution to manage such resource allocation.
Conclusion: Experts in critical care support the allocation of resources from centres with overcapacity. The results indicate the need for centrally administered allocation mechanisms that are not based on ethically disputable triage systems. It seems, therefore, that there is wide acceptance and solidarity among the European anaesthesiological community that local medical and human pressure should be relieved during a pandemic by implementing national and international re-allocation strategies among healthcare providers and healthcare systems.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Ethical guides, criteria for admission in intensive care, palliative care. Multi-society recommendations for allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic].Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:45-64. Medicina (B Aires). 2020. PMID: 32658848 Spanish.
-
Prioritising 'already-scarce' intensive care unit resources in the midst of COVID-19: a call for regional triage committees in South Africa.BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00596-5. BMC Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33752662 Free PMC article.
-
Anaesthesia practice in Europe: A survey of the National Anaesthesiologists Societies Committee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Mar 1;42(3):189-202. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002110. Epub 2024 Dec 16. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 39686675
-
Allocation of intensive care resources during an infectious disease outbreak: a rapid review to inform practice.BMC Med. 2020 Dec 18;18(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01871-9. BMC Med. 2020. PMID: 33334347 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coronavirus disease 2019: Utilizing an ethical framework for rationing absolutely scarce health-care resources in transplant allocation decisions.Am J Transplant. 2020 Sep;20(9):2332-2336. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15914. Epub 2020 Apr 26. Am J Transplant. 2020. PMID: 32282992 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ethical rationing of healthcare resources during COVID-19 outbreak: Review.Ethics Med Public Health. 2021 Mar;16:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100633. Epub 2021 Feb 8. Ethics Med Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33585668 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A survey and analysis of peri-operative quality indicators promoted by National Societies of Anaesthesiologists in Europe: The EQUIP project.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Nov 1;41(11):800-812. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002054. Epub 2024 Sep 12. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 39262333 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts and Lessons Learned of the First Three COVID-19 Waves on Cross-Border Collaboration in the Field of Emergency Medical Services and Interhospital Transports in the Euregio-Meuse-Rhine: A Qualitative Review of Expert Opinions.Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;10:841013. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.841013. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35372226 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Truog RD, Mitchell C, Daley GQ. The toughest triage—allocating ventilators in a pandemic. New Engl J Med 2020; 382:1973–1975. - PubMed
-
- Biddison ELD, Faden R, Gwon HS, et al. . Too many patients… a framework to guide statewide allocation of scarce mechanical ventilation during disasters. Chest 2019; 155:848–854. - PubMed
-
- Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, et al. . Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. New Engl J Med 2020; 382:2049–2055. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical