Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):344-347.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001423.

Treating patients across European Union borders: An international survey in light of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic

Affiliations

Treating patients across European Union borders: An international survey in light of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic

Elisabeth H Adam et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: In light of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, how resources are managed and the critically ill are allocated must be reviewed. Although ethical recommendations have been published, strategies for dealing with overcapacity of critical care resources have so far not been addressed.

Objectives: Assess expert opinion for allocation preferences regarding the growing imbalance between supply and demand for medical resources.

Design: A 10-item questionnaire was developed and sent to the most prominent members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC).

Setting: Survey via a web-based platform.

Patients: Respondents were members of the National Anaesthesiologists Societies Committee and Council Members of the ESAIC; 74 of 80 (92.5%), responded to the survey.

Measurements and main results: Responses were analysed thematically. The majority of respondents (83.8%), indicated that resources for COVID-19 were available at the time of the survey. Of the representatives of the ESAIC governing bodies, 58.9% favoured an allocation of excess critical care capacity: 69% wished to make them available to supraregional patients, whereas 30.9% preferred to keep the resources available for the local population. Regarding the type of distribution of resources, 35.3% preferred to make critical care available, 32.4% favoured the allocation of medical equipment and 32.4% wished to support both options. The majority (59.5%) supported the implementation of a central European institution to manage such resource allocation.

Conclusion: Experts in critical care support the allocation of resources from centres with overcapacity. The results indicate the need for centrally administered allocation mechanisms that are not based on ethically disputable triage systems. It seems, therefore, that there is wide acceptance and solidarity among the European anaesthesiological community that local medical and human pressure should be relieved during a pandemic by implementing national and international re-allocation strategies among healthcare providers and healthcare systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proposal for a mechanism of a European institution to structure the allocation of critical care resources

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guan W-j, Ni Z-y, Hu Y, et al. . China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1708–1720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Truog RD, Mitchell C, Daley GQ. The toughest triage—allocating ventilators in a pandemic. New Engl J Med 2020; 382:1973–1975. - PubMed
    1. Biddison ELD, Faden R, Gwon HS, et al. . Too many patients… a framework to guide statewide allocation of scarce mechanical ventilation during disasters. Chest 2019; 155:848–854. - PubMed
    1. Oksanen A, Kaakinen M, Latikka R, et al. . Regulation and trust: 3-month follow-up study on COVID-19 mortality in 25 European countries. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020; 6:e19218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, et al. . Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. New Engl J Med 2020; 382:2049–2055. - PubMed