Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 22;4(24):6291-6297.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003238.

Intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with brain metastases

Affiliations

Intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with brain metastases

Avi Leader et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed in treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis, but limited data exist regarding safety of DOACs in patients with brain metastases. We aimed to determine the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with brain metastases receiving DOACs or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation. An international 2-center retrospective cohort study was designed. Follow-up started on the first day of concomitant anticoagulation and brain tumor diagnosis. At least 2 brain imaging studies were mandated. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of any spontaneous ICH at 12-month follow-up with death as a competing risk. Major ICH was defined as spontaneous, ≥10 mL in volume, symptomatic, or requiring surgical intervention. Imaging studies were centrally reviewed by a neuroradiologist blinded for anticoagulant type. PANWARDS (platelets, albumin, no congestive heart failure, warfarin, age, race, diastolic blood pressure, stroke) score for prediction of ICH was calculated. We included 96 patients with brain metastases (41 DOAC, 55 LMWH). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major ICH was 5.1% in DOAC-treated patients and 11.1% in those treated with LMWH (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-2.21). When anticoagulation was analyzed as a time-varying covariate, the risk of any ICH did not differ between DOAC- and LMWH-treated patients (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.28-3.40). PANWARDS score was not associated with ICH risk. This international 2-center study suggests comparable safety of LMWH and DOACs in patients with brain metastases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.L. reports personal fees from Pfizer and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare outside the submitted work. S.Y.-K. reports grants from BMS and personal fees from Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Teva outside the submitted work. S.M. reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, BMS Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Portola during the conduct of the study, as well as grants and personal fees from GSK and Aspen and personal fees from Sanofi outside the submitted work. H.R.B. reports grants and personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Roche, IONIS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Novartis outside the submitted work. J.I.Z. reports grants from Incyte during the conduct of the study and grants from Incyte and Quercegen, personal fees from CSL, Merck, Parexel, Sanofi, Daiichi, Pfizer/BMS, and Portola outside the submitted work. G.S. reports personal fees from Pfizer, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Twelve-month cumulative incidence of ICH, stratified for anticoagulation class (DOAC vs LMWH). (A) Major ICH. (B) Any ICH. Death was considered a competing risk (Aalen-Johansen estimator), and type of anticoagulant was a fixed variable.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Twelve-month cumulative incidence of ICH, stratified for high-risk (≥25) vs low-risk (<25) PANWARDS score. Death was considered a competing risk (Aalen-Johansen estimator). PANWARDS score was calculated at index using platelet count, albumin, history of congestive heart failure, age, race, diastolic blood pressure, and previous history of stroke or transient ischemic attack.

References

    1. Erichsen R, Christiansen CF, Mehnert F, Weiss NS, Baron JA, Sørensen HT. Colorectal cancer and risk of atrial fibrillation and flutter: a population-based case-control study. Intern Emerg Med. 2012;7(5):431-438. - PubMed
    1. Conen D, Wong JA, Sandhu RK, et al. . Risk of malignant cancer among women with new-onset atrial fibrillation. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(4):389-396. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donnellan E, Khorana AA. Cancer and venous thromboembolic disease: a review. Oncologist. 2017;22(2):199-207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerber DE, Grossman SA, Streiff MB. Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(8):1310-1318. - PubMed
    1. Riedl J, Preusser M, Nazari PMS, et al. . Podoplanin expression in primary brain tumors induces platelet aggregation and increases risk of venous thromboembolism. Blood. 2017;129(13):1831-1839. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances