Conventional Surgical Management of Bile Duct Stones: A Service Model and Outcomes of 1318 Laparoscopic Explorations
- PMID: 33351482
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004680
Conventional Surgical Management of Bile Duct Stones: A Service Model and Outcomes of 1318 Laparoscopic Explorations
Abstract
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to describe the service model of one-session management, with a limited role for preoperative endoscopic clearance. The secondary aim was to review the outcomes and long term follow up in comparison to available studies on LCBDE.
Background: The laparoscopic era brought about a decline in the conventional surgical management of common bile duct stones. Preoperative endoscopic removal became the primary method of managing choledocholithiasis. Although LCBDE deals with gallstones and ductal stones in onw session, the limited availability of such an advanced procedure perpetuated the reliance on the endoscopic approach.
Methods: Prospective data was entered into a single surgeon's database containing 5739 laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 28 years and analyzed.
Results: One thousand eighteen consecutive LCBDE were included (23% of the series). Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in 1292 (98.0%). The median age was 60 years, male to female ratio 1:2 and 75% were emergency admissions. Most patients (43.4%) presented with jaundice. 66% had transcystic explorations and one third through a choledochotomy with 2.1% retained stones, 1.2% conversion, 18.7% morbidity, and 0.2% mortality. Postoperative ERCPs were needed in 3.1%. Recurrent stones occurred in 3%.
Conclusions: One stage LCBDE is a safe and cost-effective treatment where the expertise and equipment are available. Endoscopic treatment has a role for specific indications but remains the first-line treatment in most units. This study demonstrates that establishing specialist services through training and logistic support can optimize the outcomes of managing common bile duct stones.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Response to the Comment on "Conventional Surgical Management of Bile Duct Stones: A Service Model and Outcomes of 1318 Laparoscopic Explorations".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e902-e903. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004945. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 34029221 No abstract available.
-
Comment on "Conventional Surgical Management of Bile Duct Stones: A Service Model and Outcomes of 1318 Laparoscopic Explorations".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e901-e902. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004951. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 34029227 No abstract available.
References
-
- Tazuma S. Gallstone disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:1075–1083.
-
- Dasari B, Tan C, Gurusamy K, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Databse Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD003327.
-
- Reinders J, Gouma D, Ubbink D, et al. Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2014;38:2403–2411.
-
- Wandling M, Hungness E, Pavey E, et al. Nationwide assessment of trends in choledocholithiasis management in the United States from 1998 to 2013. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:1125–1130.
-
- Baucom R, Feurer I, Shelton J, et al. Surgeons, ERCP, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: do we need a standard approach for common bile duct stones? Surg Endos. 2016; 30:414–423.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources